unfreeradical, 8 months ago (edited 8 months ago) Sure, but the post is simply asserting that any advances for workers would require force against bosses. The way I understood the objection is that eliminating the bosses would never be achieved. The objection that fairness for workers requires completely eliminating bosses is parsing the semantics, which is a confusing way to respond.
Sure, but the post is simply asserting that any advances for workers would require force against bosses.
The way I understood the objection is that eliminating the bosses would never be achieved.
The objection that fairness for workers requires completely eliminating bosses is parsing the semantics, which is a confusing way to respond.