bibliolater,
@bibliolater@qoto.org avatar

World’s largest study shows the more you walk, the lower your risk of death, even if you walk fewer than 5,000 steps https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/997859 @science

Edelruth,
@Edelruth@mastodon.online avatar

@bibliolater @science

Hm.

Everyone's risk of death is in fact 100%
It's the quality of the journey that matters, and that is not necessarily directly related to its length.

meredithw,
@meredithw@wandering.shop avatar

@bibliolater @science Remember - correlation^= causation. That's especially true for studies like this were there's a good chance of reverse causation - that is, people with worse health not being able to walk as much.

meliache, (edited )
@meliache@hep.social avatar

@meredithw @bibliolater @science Good point, as a medical layperson I would have not thought of that. Since the causal interpretation seems mechanistically plausible, it is tempting. I have yet to read the full paper but its abstract and conclusion are more carefully phrased than the reporting about the paper. I wonder if one can factor out negative correlation somehow in study design or analysis.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • [email protected]
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • Socialism
  • KbinCafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • oklahoma
  • feritale
  • SuperSentai
  • KamenRider
  • All magazines