Teri_Kanefield, 7 months ago Here we have something unusual: As evidence, we get statements from Trump's lawyers. So . . . the lawyers are acting witnesses offering testimony? "Your honor, this whole trial is unfair. I can prove it! My lawyer said so! I'd like to enter his testimony as evidence." Then of course they bring in the unfairness of the gag order. Again their assumption is that she isn't staff. She's a co-judge. They looked up all of her political contributions. 4/
Here we have something unusual: As evidence, we get statements from Trump's lawyers.
So . . . the lawyers are acting witnesses offering testimony?
"Your honor, this whole trial is unfair. I can prove it! My lawyer said so! I'd like to enter his testimony as evidence."
Then of course they bring in the unfairness of the gag order. Again their assumption is that she isn't staff. She's a co-judge.
They looked up all of her political contributions.
4/