Daojoan,
@Daojoan@mastodon.social avatar

You either die a hero, or you live long enough to rebrand with a sans serif logo

barryparr,
@barryparr@sfba.social avatar

@Daojoan @lisamelton

It’s especially weird to see luxury brands doing this, when all they have to sell is tradition and heritage.

bhahne,
@bhahne@mastodon.online avatar

@Daojoan Yow, same thing with the Google logo! It was a serif font until 2015. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_logo

darwinwoodka,
@darwinwoodka@mastodon.social avatar

@Daojoan what's the point when they all look the same...

negative12dollarbill,
@negative12dollarbill@techhub.social avatar

@Daojoan
If it's simply your company name in a specific font, does it even count as a "logo" any more?

The IBM logo is a real logo: it is composed of stripes. I can't just type the three letters, choose the right font and I'm done. It has another, hard-to-replicate aspect.

Essentially, nobody HAS a logo any more.

realsimon,
@realsimon@mastodon.green avatar

@Daojoan if anybody knows why so many companies simplify their logos please let me know. I don't accept 'they're stupid' as an answer. There has to be a reason.

eglerion,
@eglerion@mastodon.berlin avatar

@realsimon @Daojoan Because designers orientate their work at trends and they're basically all look at the same style books, at least marketing people of big companies do. And ultra simplicity and brutalism was trend for the last 5-10 years or so. But its already shifting again to the old(er looking) logos because of the retro-nostalgia /Y2K trend.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines