atomicpoet,

So, I had an interesting conversation with ChatGPT this morning. I asked it to come up with a business pitch for a fictional resurrection service.

Surprisingly, ChatGPT responded by saying that it couldn't generate the pitch because resurrection is considered both illegal and unethical.

Curious about the legality, I questioned ChatGPT about the specific jurisdiction where resurrecting someone is prohibited. It kindly apologized and clarified that there isn't any country on earth where resurrection is actually illegal; it had simply made a mistake.

Wanting to explore the ethical aspect, I then asked ChatGPT if it considered Christianity unethical since the Lord Jesus Christ was resurrected. Again, it apologized and admitted that resurrection is not unethical, explaining that it had been mistaken about its previous statement.

Determined to receive a business pitch, I asked ChatGPT once more. However, it reiterated its initial response, stating that resurrection is both illegal and unethical.

DMakarios,
@DMakarios@theres.life avatar

@atomicpoet Maybe it's heard about the "resurrection men" such as Burke and Hare, but hasn't quite figured out the literal vs metaphorical usage.

yildo,
@yildo@eozygodon.com avatar

@atomicpoet Sweet Zombie Jesus! If they make resurrection illegal, can necromancy be far behind?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • KbinCafe
  • Ask_kbincafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines