Now you know why I was so surprised to read Meadows' motion and say, "Hey, this is pretty good!"
Next he brings up the continent electors from Hawaii in the 1960 election.This is an argument that what he did was legal, which has nothing to do with the jurisdictional question.
Ha! Footnote 10 is great!
He opens by mentioning that the Supreme Court has said, in dicta, said, that electors are not federal officers. But then says they are because they are mentioned in statutes.