onisillos,
@onisillos@mstdn.science avatar

It might be useful for new researchers to know how a journal editor screens submissions (obviously this is my approach and so it might differ for others).

I tend to start with a cold read of the abstract. By this I mean I try to do little more than glance at the title, as titles sometimes oversell or, at least, don't help my understanding of what the paper is about.

This is also why I read the cover letter second, so I have an outline of the paper before I'm subjected to the "pitch".

1/6

valdan,
@valdan@sigmoid.social avatar

@onisillos really helpful! I’m sure others in will find this useful.

I was familiar with the cover letter pitch but good to know the importance of further background and what to do with the results. Thank you for sharing.

gpollara,
@gpollara@med-mastodon.com avatar

@valdan @onisillos ah good point - should share out even wider - not sure if the group has greater reach than the hashtag, but here goes... @academicchatter
(FYI - the group has 3447 followers, so not bad!)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • Ask_kbincafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines