So in this article, they say that they are fully against any copyright laws. I’m just wondering what’s the alternative for artists to get paid?
In a perfect world everything should be accessible to everyone freely. But obviously we don’t live in this utopia. So if there was no copyright laws, how would artists receive any compensation or make a living?
Is the argument that art should be a hobby or just left for the rich who can afford to do it?
I’m genuinely interested in hearing an alternative to copyright laws.
For example if pirating became fully legal, amazon or any other corporation would simply just use that to either take in all profits for themselves or give it for free to drive traffic and make money in some other way while the actual creator would end up with nothing.
Is the current situation the best of both world for the time being? Maybe. At least this way, people can still get it for freee with some effort, while most people pay for it.
But obviously this leaves pirating websites vulnerable to be taken down at any moment, so that’s a problem. But again if you legalize it, then the big corporations would abuse it.
Anyway, just some thoughts. Eager to hear some other opinions.