FedCal,
@FedCal@mastodon.social avatar

I wrote this blog post. Talking about an innovative open source license. Give me comments about it!

https://itsfoss.community/t/thinking-about-new-open-source-licenses/10965

@itsfoss @opensource @thelinuxEXP @nixCraft @gamingonlinux @omgubuntu @omglinux

RobotToaster,

It would violate point six of the open source definition[0], so wouldn’t be an open source license.

[0] opensource.org/osd/

ArcticAmphibian,

Very nice. The first sentence is a bit of a run-on. The three question marks is a bit too informal. The sentence “If, on the other hand, the redistributed software, want to be sold too, must be purchased as it is equivalent to a for-profit company” has grammatical errors. Keep writing!

FedCal,
@FedCal@mastodon.social avatar

@ArcticAmphibian thanks for the feedback!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • [email protected]
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • Socialism
  • KbinCafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • oklahoma
  • feritale
  • SuperSentai
  • KamenRider
  • All magazines