Good question! It seems that their comment would only work as an exasperated remark if the level of rape/sexual assault/general disregard for women was higher now than it was when chaperoning and Victorian mores were prevalent, which it is not.
So we can fairly assume, unless the commenter chooses to clarify, that they were expressing annoyance at the relatively new phenomenon of women being able to retrospectively point the finger at their aggressors.
A lot of that judgement is based on seeing patterns in the arguments of conservatives and my own parsing of the comment, so it might be wrong and I’m willing to be corrected. It’s a genuinely interesting question, because without my experience of the cesspools of the internet which has caused a (reasonable) bias in my thinking, I don’t think I would have come to that conclusion. I hope we do hear more from the commenter and can see what exactly they meant.
Either way, Russell Brand is a diseased penis.
Edit: oh dear, down voted within 30 seconds of posting this very thoughtful reply! Whatever could that mean?