AuthorHelp,
@AuthorHelp@social.authorhelp.uk avatar
reprapryn,
@reprapryn@fosstodon.org avatar

@AuthorHelp @authorindiespeak @writingcommunity @clacksee I like the idea of CWs in stories as well as games and stuff. Especially ones that get revised over time

Last thing I want to be doing when watching an old detective movie and suddenly bam, rampant homophobia and someone being murdered for being gay and the protagonist being a ok with it.

Censorship, no thanks. Having a heads up on horrible shit, yes

cstross,
@cstross@wandering.shop avatar

@AuthorHelp @clacksee @authorindiespeak @writingcommunity I recognize the use of TWs, but I'm unsure how to work out which ones to apply to any given story? Because (a) if I wrote it, I don't get triggered by it (just like I can't spot my own spelling errors either), and (b) how micro-targeted should they be?

Big stuff like rape or noncon are obvious: but ... trypophobia? Antagonist-character-says-transphobic-shit (but is disapproved of by narrative PoV)? Bibendum? (cf. "Pattern Recognition".)

JetlagJen,
@JetlagJen@geekdom.social avatar

@cstross @AuthorHelp @clacksee @authorindiespeak @writingcommunity

I think the spelling errors analogy is very apt and the same approach works for finding things that need CWs.

You're likely to employ an editor and a proofreader, both of whom will help you find things you don't see in your own work. They may be able to offer CW feedback, too, or you could employ a sensitivity reader.

Be as thorough as possible, but something will slip through (also like typos), so don't overthink it.

cstross,
@cstross@wandering.shop avatar

@JetlagJen @AuthorHelp @clacksee @authorindiespeak @writingcommunity I'm trad published, which actually makes things harder: I don't directly employ an editor or proofreader, they're employed by the production editor at $PUBLISHER, and the whole workflow is designed precisely to stop authors meddling with it.

valhalla,

@cstross @clacksee @JetlagJen @AuthorHelp the obvious solution here would be to have all of the editors at all publishers spend 2-4 (paid) hours per week on AO3, reading fanfics and learning (and keeping up to date with) all common CWs and tags that readers may expect. :D

(yes, I can see myself a number of reasons why this would be impractical to the point of non-feasibility, and I'm sure I'm missing at least a few more)

cstross,
@cstross@wandering.shop avatar

@valhalla @clacksee @JetlagJen @AuthorHelp What makes you think they don't ALREADY hang out on AO3 and other fanfic/webnovel sites? (I know that my agent, for one—who used to be a trad pub editor—is a big fan of Worm by Wildbow … just can't figure out how she'd be able to make him any money (as an agent, she's on a percentage commission).)

valhalla,

@cstross @clacksee @JetlagJen @AuthorHelp in their paid time? :)

Remittancegirl,
@Remittancegirl@mstdn.social avatar

@AuthorHelp @authorindiespeak @writingcommunity @clacksee

Indeed, far from being censorship, I think that content warnings give writers the freedom to grapple with highly volatile subject matter fearlessly.

However, I have seen them overused, and used in a facile manner that erodes their usefulness.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • [email protected]
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • Socialism
  • KbinCafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • Ask_kbincafe
  • oklahoma
  • feritale
  • SuperSentai
  • KamenRider
  • All magazines