soulfirethewolf,

If this weren’t for a gimmicky publicity stunt, I’d say it would be more cost effective to just give out DLSR cameras to adoption centers.

Nath,
@Nath@aussie.zone avatar

Yes and no. DSLRs can be cheaper, but there’s something to be said about the simplicity of taking a photo and sending it immediately to a prospective family, or if your site is set up nicely, uploading it straight to a website in moments.

You can get superior photos shooting with a DSLR, but then you’ll want to put the camera somewhere safe, extract the SD card, touch it up with Photoshop/Lightroom and then save the raw as jpg. Then you can send it/upload it.

Meanwhile with the phone, you’ve taken half a dozen photos and multiple chats going on the device.

randombullet,

I’d say it’s more effective to snap a photo and upload it right away to social media than it is to take a photo, download it on an app, then upload it to social media.

Unless the shelter has a dedicated social media team, DSLRs or mirrorless would be overkill for the average person.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • [email protected]
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • oklahoma
  • Socialism
  • KbinCafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • KamenRider
  • All magazines