Comments

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

lugal, to ich_iel in ich🖕🏻iel

Oder OP hat sich drüber lustig gemacht von wegen “Armut ist immer noch besser als AfD”

lugal, to 196 in ECoNomY rule

So I was very wrong. Thanks for dewronging me! (Is that a word? It is now)

lugal, to 196 in Sin rule

c/thatsthejoke

lugal, to ich_iel in ich💩iel

Hochwähli für das Maimai, aber SPRICH-Fäden machen wir hier nicht. Das kann ruhig auf l*ses bleiben. Hier ist alles auf freiwilliger Basis

lugal, to 196 in Sin rule

Holy shit!

lugal, to 196 in Fiddle contest or..? rule

How do you play tetris against someone?

lugal, to 196 in ECoNomY rule

If I’m not mistaken he’s somewhere from western Africa. Was it Togo?

lugal, to 196 in Modern medicine is amazing rule

Yes I know. I was referring to the answer:

Replace the word with “fascists” and it makes so much more logical sense. And this is why wording matters

Which I interpreted as … well you know. I’m not going to perpetuate this argument.

lugal, to 196 in Modern medicine is amazing rule

I was about to agree with you but then I reread the statement you responded to and it’s:

Yeah fascism really ended in 1945 /s

So your suggestion is to put it:

fascists really ended in 1945

Correct me if I’m wrong, I’m not a native speaker but that’s a weird phrasing. For me it implies (or rather implicates) that all fascists ended because to end is a very strong verb semantically when applied to humans. And honestly, I wouldn’t use it at all.

lugal, to 196 in And some people think it has consciousness...

Yeah, that’s just bullshit. It isn’t even logical coherent. If we are all just reacting, where is the input supposed to come from?

lugal, to 196 in And some people think it has consciousness...

Interesting! I recently heard the phrasing that AI’s aren’t intelligent but it’s better to think of them as applied stochastic. It does not “understand” the question, it just calculates the most properly answer. That’s why they suck at suggestive questions sometimes.

And there is a second AI at play that’s important here. The main AI just knows stuff, but doesn’t reflect if the answer is appropriate. The second is trained on real people who interact with chatGPT and give feedback on the output.

So it doesn’t mention the cutoff because it’s self reflexive but because of the second AI that learned not to be too sure about real people’s latest developments and didn’t learn to differentiate between the living and the dead. I think this is a good way to illustrate this process.

lugal, to 196 in And some people think it has consciousness...

Literally 1845

lugal, to 196 in Modern medicine is amazing rule

That makes even less sense or do you think there aren’t any fascists left? Fascism as a dominant ideology ended in countries that still (continuously to this have) have fascists in them.

lugal, to 196 in And some people think it has consciousness...

That’s kind of my point. AI’s have no concept of time and even less of death and they “think” (in a metaphorical sense) very differently from us. I think it’s good to be aware of that and since this is a meme page, I don’t even need a real point. I think it’s funny even tho I fully understand the underlying process (I obviously don’t understand the process in detail but you get what I mean)

lugal, to 196 in ECoNomY rule

Yes, Andrewism is great!

If you are really interested in the topic, you should take the time to read “Debt, the first 5,000 years” by David Graeber. Totally worth it!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • Ask_kbincafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines