Highly recommend this episode. "Assessment for learning" really speaks to me and also thoughts on the distinctions between inclusion and belonging and the importance of both. #HigherEd@academicchatter
I believe that what’s going on at West Virginia University is a tragedy, but what if I’m the one who’s wrong, who has been wrong this whole time, that the democratic ideals I believe are meant to be infused into the experiences of education are for suckers who ultimately get steamrolled by a bunch of consultants?
Hi educators of the Fediverse! I regret to report that I am developing syllabi for the fall semester. I feel the need to add a statement on generative AI, and I'm interested in what others are doing/thinking about this. If you have a statement you'd be willing to share, I'd be grateful. Here's my current draft:
Use of generative AI tools (ChatGPT, e.g.) to assist you with your work for this course is off-limits for at least two reasons. First, developing your scientific writing and critical thinking skills is part of what we're trying to do here, and relying on someone or something else to do that work undermines your development as a writer and thinker. Second, the large language models on which generative AI writing tools are built are trained on the writing of other people, and they offer no way to cite the sources of the writing they produce.
(This is followed by a standard paragraph on plagiarism.)
@lewriley@edutooters I don’t teach writing but do have writing assignments. I took the approach that I can’t police them and so added this to the plagiarism section:
Likewise, using artificial intelligence (AI) software or websites, e.g. ChatGPT, without
citing it as a source and correctly citing the original source of all the information you use from
it, is plagiarism.