mlevison, to random
@mlevison@agilealliance.social avatar

is popular and that is about the only thing it has going for it. In reality it is no better than rolling die and assigning people a personality profile based on the die roll.

  • Carl Jung's ideas are at the base of the test. Unfortunately Jung's work has never been empirically tested. Hint when your base level construct is unsound you might have a train wreck on your hands.

1/6

mlevison,
@mlevison@agilealliance.social avatar

@donaldegray @marick and at least the a Gray Levison model will derived from a scientifically derived construct SCARF. Myers Briggs derived from Jung. The world of psychology has moved on from him

marick,
@marick@mstdn.social avatar

@mlevison @donaldegray Just to be a pedant: my understanding is that a reading of Jung inspired Myers-Briggs, but the Myers-Briggs model of personality differed in really substantial ways from Jung’s. I forget the detail, but it was something like Jung not being concerned with whether a person was more extraverted but rather how, in a particular person, extraversion and introversion manifested.

wildmandrake, to philosophy
@wildmandrake@mastodon.social avatar

A theoretical physicist evaluates the science of personality tests - including and the + more

What does that tell me? https://youtube.com/watch?v=peFNQCE7BVA&feature=share

@philosophy
@psychology

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • Ask_kbincafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines