KestrelSWard, to academicchatter
@KestrelSWard@glammr.us avatar

Today I am discovering the wonderful world of Open Access APCs. I, a poor queer independent researcher, would like to publish my research open access because I believe it should be free to any who need it. The publication we were pointed to as being ideal for publishing our work....wants to charge over $3000USD. I thought I was misreading that at first, but no apparently not. @academicchatter

julia, to bookstodon
@julia@hcommons.social avatar

New book alert: Coming soon! Irresistible: How Cuteness Wired Our Brains and Conquered the World by Joshua Paul Dale

:mastodance:

@bookstodon
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/oct/16/the-big-idea-why-do-we-find-cuteness-so-hard-to-resist

JulietJFall, to academicchatter
@JulietJFall@mastodon.social avatar

Publishing openly is a huge challenge at a time of increasingly fraught relations between academics and commercial publishers. Open access publishing will be discussed at the Uni of Geneva: "Affordable Open Access: exploring funding and free publishing options", part of the International Open Access Week.

Tuesday, October 24th, 2023 – 15.30-18.00 p.m. CMU, Auditorium Renold (build. B, 1st floor)
More info: https://www.unige.ch/dis/confbiblio/
@academicchatter

petersuber, to academicchatter
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

Good line from Jamie Caridi, president of Bethany College: “There are so many orthodoxies at [colleges and universities]; some are load-bearing and important, and some honestly just weigh down the institution. You don’t know which is which until you start taking a hard look at things.”
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/admissions/traditional-age/2023/09/07/what-does-it-take-buck-downward-enrollment-trends

He was talking about admissions. But I'd extend the same thought to and .


@academicchatter

OSUniBe, to random German
@OSUniBe@openbiblio.social avatar

"The Future of Academic " asks: Academic publishing is the backbone of science dissemination –– but is the current system fit for purpose?
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01637-2

SerhatTutkal,
@SerhatTutkal@fediscience.org avatar

@OSUniBe While I agree with many of the recommendations, I have previously argued against some of them, especially the one by Mastroianni about how we should publish our research on blogs, which would be a step towards the wrong direction (popularity-based evaluation of work). I'm sharing the full text: https://academicborderlands.substack.com/p/peer-review-discussions

@academicchatter @edutooters

_bydbach_, to academicchatter
@_bydbach_@hcommons.social avatar

How common is it in the humanities that an academic journal does not accept "unsolicited manuscripts" (aka article submissions: Don't contact us, we contact you.) and then has a house style that is so prohibitive that it demands to use a specific typeface that's not even included by default in MS Office? To cap it all, it's in a discipline that when it was set up in the 70s, it was intended to break down sociocultural barriers. Culture may be ordinary, but so is gatekeeping it seems.

@academicchatter

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines