You are only browsing one thread in the discussion! All comments are available on the post page.
Return
il3fm9 , 8 months ago I’m confused with some of the comments here - isn’t OP asking why the BSD 3-Clause doesn’t include a clause preventing patent treachery, which would be a good clause to have? In any case, this is why the FSF recommends the Apache 2.0 license over other permissive licenses: www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#apache2
I’m confused with some of the comments here - isn’t OP asking why the BSD 3-Clause doesn’t include a clause preventing patent treachery, which would be a good clause to have?
In any case, this is why the FSF recommends the Apache 2.0 license over other permissive licenses: www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#apache2
southernwolf OP , 8 months ago You are correct, yeah. I updated my post with more info on what I was asking about, plus the text of the two licenses.
You are correct, yeah. I updated my post with more info on what I was asking about, plus the text of the two licenses.