You are only browsing one thread in the discussion! All comments are available on the post page.

Return

medgremlin ,

Oh my fuck. I hate news stories like this. Aspartame falls into the same cancer risk category as eating red meat sometimes and being kinda lazy. A rigorous systematic review was conducted of dozens of studies of aspartame and they did not find a plausible biologic mechanism by which aspartame could cause cancer. Epidemiologically, it’s vaguely correlated, not causative of cancer.

Also, in the Reuters article it notes that a 132-lbs adult would have to drink 12 to 36 cans of diet coke a day for the dose/exposure to become relevant to the risk they’re talking about. This article is talking about one study that is at odds with the systematically reviewed data from 40 human observational studies, 12 experimental animal studies, and 1360 assay/experimental end points to look for the supposed link.

www.sciencedirect.com/…/S0278691522007475#sec5

lunarshot ,
@lunarshot@beehaw.org avatar

Your answer is as good as the that headline is bad. this was a very informative and correct analysis of aspartame. kudos

nanometre ,

Remember when Big Sugar(TM) did that study on how sugar is beneficial? Is this that again?

Mummelpuffin ,
@Mummelpuffin@beehaw.org avatar

Right? If media articles on stuff like this were all correct, literally everything but distilled water causes cancer, seemingly.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • wartaberita
  • [email protected]
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • oklahoma
  • feritale
  • KamenRider
  • Testmaggi
  • KbinCafe
  • Ask_kbincafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • Socialism
  • SuperSentai
  • All magazines