zalgotext

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

zalgotext,

Who? I’m looking at the Overwatch 2 directory right now and can’t find a single one. Like half of them listed don’t even have face cams on, judging by a quick scan of the thumbnails.

zalgotext,

From my view, I enjoy watching Twitch for two main reasons:

  1. For the same reason I like watching live sports rather than a 15 minute cut of highlights - the feeling of experiencing events in real time, the payoff of seeing a big play unfold after all the anticipation leading up to it, watching strategies and counter-strategies unfold in real time, that kind of stuff.
  2. For the same reason I like watching video essays, stand-up comedy, interview shows, podcasts, or other media where one particular person is the focus - that person is entertaining to me. They have a personality I vibe with, they’re funny, they have an interesting perspective, etc.

To a lesser extent, it’s also nice background noise. I can throw a stream on at the beginning of my workday and not have to fiddle with it until I’m done with work, because it’s a constant, reliable source of background noise.

zalgotext,

You’ve just described the two extremes of streaming and sort of just ignored the whole middle area

zalgotext,

I regularly watch streams with 500 - 3000 viewers and the chat is nothing like what you describe

zalgotext,

Steve mould - does cool little kiddie explanations of physical phenomenons.

C’mon now put some respect on his name lol. Steve is an incredibly talented science communicator, and just because he can break things down to a level a kid could understand, doesn’t mean his explanations are “kiddie”.

zalgotext,

I was hoping someone would post ZeFrank! His True Facts series is exactly what education content should be - entertaining, interesting, funny, and most importantly, rigorously sourced and credited to the real life scientists and researchers he bases his info on.

zalgotext,

Oh shit a Marblr shoutout! I love his stuff, his propensity for finding and diagnosing bugs is out of this world. He used to stream on twitch and it was really fun because it would essentially be a behind the scenes look at all the custom workshop stuff he’s built in order to reproduce bugs and get footage for his videos.

zalgotext,

Joshua Weissman. He started out super chill, most of his recipes were pretty approachable, the editing wasn’t over the top, the b-roll stuff at the end was tasteful.

Now it’s like he’s catering to a whole different crowd. The editing is over the top and jammed with memes, he’s more idk, psychotic isn’t quite the right word, but it’s way less chill, he’s constantly saying stuff like “if you don’t use XYZ ingredient then what are you even making this recipe for?”, his recipes are more over the top, and he has a much more elitist opinion of himself and his food. The change happened so quickly too, it was kind of shocking.

zalgotext,

Already subbed to both of those channels lol. I also like J. Kenji Lopez Alt and Brian Lagerstrom for similar reasons - their videos are more about how to cook than just following a particular recipe.

zalgotext,

Running a universityNCAA athletics program is legitimately very expensive

FTFY

zalgotext,

“What kind of coke head relative!”

Oh the irony

zalgotext,

Bruh lmao. Carbonara requires cooking bacon/guanciale/whatever cured pork product, boiling noodles, grating cheese, making a sauce that can break pretty easily if you’re not careful… You’re looking at at least two pots, a knife, a greater, a strainer, and a serving bowl at minimum to clean afterwards. How is that a lazy recipe?

zalgotext,

Lol yeah I know how to make carbonara. It requires at least 25 minutes of active cooking. There are no steps where you can set and forget something. You have to be near the stove the entire time it’s being made.

It’s a relatively quick recipe, sure, but I definitely wouldn’t classify it as lazy.

zalgotext,

It’s very noticable.

(Note: frequencies this low could cause discomfort or even damage to your ears, make sure your volume is at an appropriate level before hitting play, especially if you have headphones in)

zalgotext,

That’s the fun part, the anti cheat does support Linux. Apex Legends also uses easyanticheat and it’s compatible with the Steam Deck, with a Gold rating on protondb.

zalgotext,

Mmm, yes, much better to just throw around off-the-wall accusations based on a couple sentences

zalgotext,

What about a wheelchair doesn’t fit into a fantasy setting, especially DnD’s fantasy setting with it’s various steampunk elements?

zalgotext,

No, it’s milk. The term “milk” has been used to describe white, creamy, slightly viscous liquids for centuries, and almond milk specifically is listed as an ingredient in many medieval recipes.

zalgotext,

IDK man, the more historical Renaissance fairs still exist, with people a bit more strict about dressing period-appropriately. The ones you’re talking about are basically a whole separate thing, it’s basically a fantasy-inspired comic-con, and attracts a whole different audience.

I don’t think there’s anything wrong with either. I think it’s awesome that there’s places for people to sell their niche handmade goods while sporting the fashions of 17th-century France or whatever, as well as places where people can dress up like fantasy creatures, tails and all.

zalgotext,

Ok, I like trees as much as the next person, and much prefer them over these algae tanks.

But what about these “massive experimental water tanks” do you think will damage the infrastructure beneath and around it like tree roots do?

zalgotext,

I can’t confirm or deny your claims about soaking, because I never went to BYU.

However, I did live in a smallish town in Utah for a year, and I can confirm I saw more married and pregnant 18 year old teens in that one year than I’ve seen in the entire rest of my life.

zalgotext,

Learn to make your own coffee instead of buying Starbucks or whatever

Be warned, this habit can very easily form into a hobby that is more expensive than buying Starbucks every morning

zalgotext,

Nah, what would be silly is using Manhattan distance

zalgotext,

How does 2 minute fast food work? They must precook most of the food and just assemble it for the customer.

Yes. That’s how fast food works.

Why do y’all buy that shit?

It’s cheap and fast.

Wouldn’t you rather wait 10 minutes for a decent meal cooked fresh to order?

Buddy, if it’s only taking 10 minutes, it ain’t “cooked fresh to order”.

Is there no alternative?

Sure. But people like fast food, for one reason or another. It’s like you’re assuming that because you don’t like it, no one else likes it either, and they only eat it out of necessity. How arrogant of you.

zalgotext,

Yeah I don’t understand the people who claim Chick-fil-a is bland.

Soggy, sure, sometimes. All fried food can be soggy, if you go on a bad day and you get a piece that’s been sitting for too long.

No spice, sure. Spice is relatively subjective. They do have the spicy sandwich which I think is better than the plain, but that’s my opinion, other people may not agree.

White meat, yeah, they use white meat. I like white meat, when it’s done well, but again, that’s subjective.

Bland though, I just can’t fathom. The way Chick-fil-a prepares their chicken before frying is a wet brine. Chemically, there is no way for wet-brined chicken to come out bland. Either osmosis takes place and salt gets inside the meat, or osmosis doesn’t happen because the salt was already there. And Chick-fil-a’s quality standards are stringent, so a particular franchise couldn’t get away with skipping that step, at least not for long. So you can call Chick-fil-a many things, but if someone calls it bland, I question if they’ve actually eaten there.

zalgotext, (edited )

Unless we find a scientific explanation for problems such as 'an infinite past can never reach the present", or energy coming out of nothing, straight up denying the possibility of the existence of God seems like premature celebration.

Why do you need a scientific explanation for that, but you don’t need a scientific explanation for “an eternal and all powerful creator that is not bound by space or time”? Sounds like you’re just replacing what you believe to be an* unprovable claim with your own unprovable claim, which just seems like a huge cop out.

Btw, there are tons of hypotheses on how the universe started “from nothing”, including

  • It didn’t, our big bang was the result of a previous universe collapsing
  • the universe was all dark matter, then some yet-to-be discovered reaction started converting the dark matter to “normal” matter
  • Reactions between matter and anti-matter created the energy needed for the big bang

The point though, is that your base premise is just wrong. Science doesn’t say that the universe started “from nothing”, it says “we don’t know exactly how the universe started, but we’re trying to figure it out”.

zalgotext,

This does not explain time starting at a point where time didn’t exist.

It doesn’t try to. Science is still trying to figure it out, which is the whole point.

It just defers the problem.

You say “defer”, I say “still trying to figure it out”.

If we came from a different universe then where did that universe come from? And the one before that? If we go on infinitely we can still never reach the present.

We don’t know yet, but science is trying to figure it out.

If there was dark matter, or energy, or gas, wherever did that come from and what was before it? From nothing to something? If that dark matter existed infinitely before, how can we even reach the present?

We don’t know yet, but science is trying to figure it out.

God being almighty and eternal is a solution that solves this dilemma of an eternal past, because God can create time.

A solution, but is it the solution? Until demonstrable evidence is presented, it’s just a hypothesis like all the others. The difference is the other hypotheses give us something to test. Yours would have us just throw up our hands and say “idk, must be God I guess”, which doesn’t really fly in the world of science.

Edit: And you still haven’t answered the question: Why do you need a scientific explanation for the beginning of the universe, the beginning of time, etc., but you don’t need one for the existence of “an eternal and all powerful creator that is not bound by space or time”? Why hold up scientific rigour in one case, but accept with blind faith in another?

zalgotext,

I just realized how I ended up with relatively minor hangovers at worst in college - the bar I frequented had free hot dogs and popcorn, which were salty, delicious little electrolyte sources.

zalgotext,

It’s almost like, in such a huge country, there exist people with different tastes.

followed up by

The other was some nauseating English breakfast spread, with like baked beans (that’s for summer BBQs not breakfast!).

I really hope that’s irony

zalgotext,

eatible

Yeah, they’re not actually American

zalgotext,

It’s been posted on… A discussion-based forum website

zalgotext,

Are you this uncomfortable when you watch cartoons like Scooby-Doo or SpongeBob and female characters with breasts appear on screen

zalgotext,

It’s literally Pete’s camper from A Goofy Movie

zalgotext,

Man I really wanted to like Satisfactory and play it all the way through, but it’s just that much worse than factorio in a lot of ways, it didn’t quite hook me in the same way. It got really repetitive/grueling in the late game, I think the tier after aluminum, and I just got bored with it.

zalgotext,

What I’m REALLY looking for but having trouble finding is something like a city builder or house builder that there is no money, nothing like that. Just creativity in building.

Not sure if it’s quite what you’re looking for, but building in Valheim is quite fun, and it has a creative mode, so you can just go crazy without having to grind for materials.

zalgotext,

Oh wait you missed one - do you like it when games have really cool and creative mechanics like ship building and base building, which you can pour glorious hours into as something to finally break up the monotony, only for the game to tell you “fuck you, build it all over again loser” when you start their sorry excuse for a new game plus?

zalgotext,

Watching a Starfield playthrough on Twitch was definitely captivating for me. So captivating that I started another replay through the Mass Effect trilogy

zalgotext,

Also biologists: “vegetable” is purely a culinary term, and doesn’t have any significance in the world of botany

zalgotext,

the ability to share models and interfaces between front and backend

On the other hand, this can be considered a downside because it locks you into using JS/TS on the front and backends.

Alternatively, if you define your models and interface with an Open API spec, you can write the front and backends in whatever language you want.

zalgotext,

I’m still pissed that the McGuffin in that movie was basic-ass time travel, when they had the way cooler McGuffin of the Quantum Realm they could have explored.

To make matters even worse, it’s seeming like the real reason they did the time travel BS was so they could start the multiverse BS, so they had a justification to continue pumping out garbage content.

zalgotext,

Lol thank you, I genuinely appreciate the pedantry

zalgotext,

Dude I’m stupid and didn’t really pay attention to the moon dust stuff, but it’s ok because that game is so good, they frame that scene so well and have the moon just visible over GladOS’s shoulder (so to speak), I still realized exactly what I needed to do. Probably one of my favorite “ah-ha” moments in gaming.

zalgotext,

Guys these are all stock photos

zalgotext,

I imagine the increased torque of electric motors has something to do with it too. That extra power has to go somewhere

zalgotext, (edited )

So they’re losing the same amount of money either way.

But if they own the property, they can potentially get that money back as the value of the property increases. Property is an appreciating asset, at least in the current US housing market, which is the frame of reference I’m coming from.

And how would they be building wealth through property, if the property value doesn’t rise?

The property value almost certainly will rise, as long as the property owner maintains it properly.

I think you’re assuming that I would be paying off a loan with their rent?

I was assuming that, yes, but it’s sort of besides the point. The fact remains, any money a renter puts in, they can’t ever get back. The property owner however, being the one in control of the appreciating asset, can grow the money that they collect from the renter by investing it back into their property, increasing the rate at which it appreciates.

Edit: in the imaginary scenario where property value never changes, the tenant is still paying all the costs of homeownership, without the benefit of homeownership, ie, owning an asset which has value and can be sold. In this scenario the landlord is simply a middleman who is hoarding an asset.

zalgotext,

Yes

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines