@sir_reginald@lemmy.world
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

sir_reginald

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

efforts

I think the appropriate word here is marketing. There’s no real privacy in an Apple device.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

I don’t know what the fuck is going on with Kagi on Lemmy. They must be using bots or paying people for promoting them. I just don’t get how people can trust them so much when they haven’t released the code for anything, they require you to be logged in which makes the user uniquely identifiable and therefore could easily correlate your searches to your identity (even if they claim not to, it’s just a “trust me, bro”)

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

what transparency and “privacy focus” are you talking about?

They haven’t released a single line of code and they required you to be logged in, which makes you uniquely identifiable, and if you paid using credit card, then you gave away your personal identifiable information.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

imagine if nvidia started launching new graphic cards but they only developed drivers for Windows XP. No support for 7, 10 or 11.

So, the graphic cards work yeah. On a legacy system.

Meta (Facebook / Instagram) to move to a "Pay for your Rights" approach (noyb.eu)

The Wall Street Journal reported that Meta plans to move to a “Pay for your Rights” model, where EU users will have to pay $ 168 a year (€ 160 a year) if they don’t agree to give up their fundamental right to privacy on platforms such as Instagram and Facebook. History has shown that Meta’s regulator, the Irish DPC, is...

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

let’s not pretend that Telegram is any better than using WhatsApp.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

It’s not free to publish apps on the Play Store. And I’m not sure if this is still the case today, but I recall of Google forcing to include their libraries on apps published there.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

it’s quite fun to see the whole thing you want to engineer just to have an excuse to use a blockchain.

Have you ever heard of Torrents? USENET? eDonkey? Those things are more resilient than your blockchain, they’ve proved themselves by being around more than 20 years and still in use.

sir_reginald, (edited )
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah, people don’t realize that just because a software is available for Linux, it isn’t acceptable that it’s proprietary.

I don’t care what other people uses, but posts promoting it shouldn’t be allowed in a Linux community.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

I’m running Arch Linux in a 18 year old laptop. And I could and have run Debian in the very same laptop in the past.

I don’t get your point at all. If laptops were as repairable as desktops, we could continue using them for 15+ years. And software support, thanks to the GNU/Linux distro maintainers, is not a problem.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

Kagi can claim whatever they want in their privacy policy. Where’s the code of their servers? Because I see none. How do we know they aren’t keeping logs that could be easily correlated (by themselves or a third party who access their servers)?

Even if we had the code, I would still be skeptical, we can’t be sure what code are they exactly running on the server side and having an account linked to every search is just awful.

SearXNG is anonymous while offering the very same features, if not better.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

You aren’t wrong about not knowing if SearXNG instances are running a modified version of SearXNG that tries to log you.

Fortunately, we don’t need to trust those instances. They do not require you to login, so there’s not an unique identifier (like an account) to associate your searches with other than your IP address which you can hide with a VPN, or even better, using a .onion instance (something that Kagi does not have at all AFAIK).

For using Kagi, no matter if you switch your IP address every time, if you delete cookies after closing your browser or if you buy a new laptop for every search query, you’re uniquely identified because you need to log into your account.

And for that account, you have to use a payment method. Sure, you can try and pay with a Monero to Bitcoin exchanger and do not give any personal information (and if we’re being realistic, we know most Kagi clients aren’t doing this). Even if you paid anonymously, you can only achieve pseudonymity because you’re associated with your account.

With SearXNG, I could use a different .onion instance for each query and be completely anonymous (that’s completely overkill, but it illustrates my point well).

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

No. Kagi’s fault is needing an account, a unique identifier which all searches could be correlated to.

SearXNG could leak your IP if your VPN provider was keeping logs? Definitely. And so does Kagi. Tor could be attacked by a three letter agency and compromise your .onion connection to SearXNG? Definitely. And it would be easier to de-anonimyze you when connecting to Kagi, which doesn’t have an onion domain. Do you need to give SearXNG your email and/or payment information? Not at all. But Kagi requires it. Can you look like two completely different users when doing two queries to SearXNG? Easy. Not possible with Kagi. Do we have the server’s code? We do for SearXNG instances. We don’t have Kagi’s.

I think it’s pretty clear the privacy compromise here.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

I hope he gets over it. He was a true visionary.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

the answer is yes, unless you’re on GrapheneOS. Google Services is a privileged app and therefore it can bypass permissions as it sees fit.

GrapheneOS (optionally) installs it as a unprivileged app, which you can restrict permissions to. Still, I wouldn’t recommend installing it since they have extensive telemetry.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

what’s the purpose of not giving it network permissions? you won’t be able to install apps, use push notifications or any other major functionality.

I could be missing something, of course.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

Try luck with throwaway email + VPN. Although it’s possible they’ll still be able to identity you if you’re the only one using that VPN on your local Walmart. At least they won’t be able to see your traffic.

I'm not worried about saving my location. Are you? (upload.wikimedia.org)

In the privacy community there are services, programs for private maps use. Some even suggest using the phone without a SIM card (which is quite possible, but you can get into trouble). But I don’t use them, as my geolocation is already tracked by an advanced camera system in my city, by my cell provider via triangulation....

sir_reginald, (edited )
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

what do you mean by you can get into trouble for using a phone without a SIM card? A WiFi only phone is just a smaller tablet.

And yeah, cities with extensive camera vigilance can be a problem impossible to solve. There’s not much you can do about that other than protest.

Your cell provider might track you via triangulation, but this is solved by either plane mode, turning your phone off or a Faraday bag. Of course those would render your phone useless (except plane mode and WiFi activated).

it’s a problem quite difficult to solve right now. if you want a working phone, at least your cell provider will track you. But by using open street maps you don’t give your data to Google too, so you minimize who has it.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

oh okay, I thought you meant legal trouble. Of course that you won’t be receiving calls without a SIM card.

There’s a way of receiving calls without a SIM card, and that’s using VOIP numbers, like Twillio. But you’d need to be connected to WiFi of course. So there’s not real solution to this problem other than letting your cell provider track you.

I suggest using Tor or a VPN (with jurisdiction outside of your local government claws) at all times so even if they get your location, they don’t know what are you doing with your phone.

Also, Yandex might sell the information to other third parties that your government might not sell to, so I would still use open street maps unless the difference in comfort of using Yandex is a big deal for you.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

What do you mean? only the ones in the screen or the very first ones from years ago tend to fail. Otherwise, fingerprint scanners on Android work like a charm.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

that server is directly tied to you. this won’t make a difference at all.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

that’s why Apple forces replacement parts to be paired with the original device, making impossible for repair shops to scrap and reuse parts of broken iPhones to repair others.

ifixit.com/…/we-are-retroactively-dropping-the-ip…

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

Let’s be honest, Gmail, being a Google service, was condemned to have an awful UI which can’t work without loading megabytes of JS into your browser.

The good news are that they still support mail clients, which everyone should be using except for those occasions you’re working from a device you do not own.

The bad news are that Gmail still analyzes your emails in the server side, and uses them to serve you tracking ads and train AI models. So maybe switching providers altogether is a better option for those who have a choice.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

In certain companies, people’s corporate email could be through Gmail (or whatever they’ve name their email services for businesses).

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

at this point you’re probably trolling but whatever, here’s a Duckduckgo link since you “can’t afford” googling

duckduckgo.com/?q=realme+10+pro+plus+custom+rom

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

I haven’t used Windows since XP, but I’m interested in how that works. Do you have any link about this?

Instant Messengers Analysis and Comparison (privacy.awiki.org)

The table is quite big (190+ lines of hand-written HTML) and it doesn’t fit on mobile phone screens unless you zoom out. It should be fine on desktop. It also specifies the criteria followed and has analysis of some of the IMs in the table (not close to all of them, I hope to add more analysis in the future)....

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

yeah, I agree. I hope the project lasts, because it’s by far the best option. I hope they manage to implement having the same “account” in both desktop and mobile, it’s the only feature I miss.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

oh I didn’t know what changes OMEMO 2 introduced. Thanks, I’ll add a note.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

thanks, I didn’t know this one

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

That’s why I recommend XMPP.

As of why multi-device sync isn’t a core feature is due to the inherent nature of the SimpleX protocol that everything is stored locally, servers are only relays and do not store nothing more than heavily encrypted packages that only contains messages and once they are delivered, they are immediately removed. Servers do not store any information, they don’t have your contacts, nor any form of unique identification for your account. You might even change the relay you’re using every 5 minutes, because you aren’t tied to them.

Compare that with XMPP where you’re hosted in one server and all your messages and conversations go to that single server. Your server also stores your contact list for multi-device sync and because you’re always using the same server for that account, it will work seamlessly. In SimpleX, your account information never leaves your device.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

What metadata is leaked? AFAIK, the relays you connect to don’t even know who you are because there’s no single identifier tied to you.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

I mean, XMPP also leaks your IP to the server if you don’t use Tor or a VPN. If you don’t trust the server, it’s a must to hide your IP.

I don’t think that changes anything in the comparison. Except Briar, which uses Tor by default, I think that every other messenger reveals your IP to the server if you aren’t actively hiding it. That’s just how it works. At least SimpleX and XMPP can be used through onion services, something that others don’t offer.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

yeah I agree that XMPP is currently the best option.

But SimpleX is also self-hostable, you can configure it to only connect to your own relay server. Or just use .onion servers. So SimpleX is a close second IMO.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

electron is mentioned in the OS supported section as a platform. Not taken into account for the privacy part, as you can see it is neither red or green. Also, there’s not a single mention of Element, because it’s just one client, yes.

I encourage you to read our criteria, I think you’ll find it quite reasonable.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

I just did a text search on the page and There’s no mention of electron outside the Operating System support in the table, which is not taken into account for the rating.

And yes, I like that There’s no official client for XMPP which helps it’s independence from any entity or corporation, potential bad actors trying to push malicious features. But that’s beyond my point.

I don’t judge Element instead of Matrix. I just mention the OS support which is not rated and I make clear that there are other clients.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

Briar and GNU Jami are the best privacy friendly P2P messengers. I think they have MacOS support but not sure.

SimpleX Chat, although not P2P, uses servers as relays and they get virtually not data from you. You can even switch relays daily or host your own. Depending on your use case, it could be useful since IMO it works better than P2P messengers (due to the limitations of P2P)

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

I didn’t know this one, and after looking through their website, I can’t trust them at all.

Dev’s email is gmail. First red flag. And their social media profile are Twitter, Instagram and Facebook. Not to mention that all I can read about their “protocol” is shitty marketing speak. There’s no technical whitepaper. And there’s no code. It seems to be proprietary software which is enough reason to run away from it. Together with the rest of things, it looks like either it’s a honeypot or (more probably) a fake privacy initiative trying to grab some money/data from non technical users.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

not at all. with that, you achieve pseudonymity, because even if they can’t know who you are, they can tie every search you do to the very same account, your “pseudonym”.

with DuckDuckgo (and I’m not a DDG fan to be honest) I can just change my IP and clear browser local storage to make several anonymous searches.

with kagi, even if you take the inconvenience of creating a new account each month, all your monthly searches are tied to a single account.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

Not as far as i can tell. If you used a new burner email every time and paid through trocador with monero your payments could be tied back to the instant exchange, but no farther since monero uses ring signatures.

I didn’t mean to your real identity (if you’ve managed to do payment well enough and never leak your IP while using it), I meant that even if you create a new pseudonym every month, all your monthly searches are tied to a single pseudonym, which can reveal a lot about an individual.

XMPP vs Matrix: Whose King of Federation? (video.simplifiedprivacy.com)

XMPP and Matrix are two competing federated end-to-end encrypted messengers. XMPP is far better, on server cost decentralization, speed over Tor, degoogled push notifications, multi-identities, and overall privacy. So if Matrix is inferior centralized bloatware, why is it more popular? Especially among techies, who should in...

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

idk about the rest but the $5 Hetzner box running Synapse is inaccurate. While you can definitely run either Prosody or Synapse in the same box, Prosody consumes much less resources, which means that if, for example, a $5 box can run a 500 users Prosody (XMPP) server, that same box running Synapse could allocate only around 100 users

(not actual numbers, I haven’t done any real benchmark other than installing both of them in my Raspberry Pi, mess around with both and test how Prosody’s resources consumption is much lower, both on “idle” and when receiving traffic)

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

I get your point and your use case, but I like to look further in the viability of the network.

yeah of course, a $5 box can’t host 500 users, they weren’t actual numbers. But in my tests on limited hardware, Synapse consumed almost twice as much RAM and CPU for (barely) the same usage. So I’d imagine that when scaling things up a large XMPP server can be run with much less hardware than a similarly sized Matrix server.

This is quite relevant for the longevity of the network. Cheaper hosting means more people can afford to voluntarily run servers and also less amount of donations can cover the costs.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

small communities of self-hosters that offer the services to those who don’t possess the knowledge to do it themselves. These communities would self-host federated protocols (eg XMPP) so people can interact with others no matter which server they use.

Ideally maintained through users donations. If you want to be less idealistic, maybe small co-ops which charge a reasonable monthly/annual fee and provide free services for those who can’t really afford to pay.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

it uses Android’s webview, which is a chromium browser that comes with Android by default to be used inside apps. This means that it does not need to be updated frequently, since it is just a wrapper for Android’s webview. And bookwyrm itself is updated on the server side and sent to your browser, so no need to update that locally either.

From reading their github’s repo, the only thing the developer adding is a barcode scanning for books to be used within webview. Not sure how many updates that thing needs, probably not many.

In conclusion, as long as webview is updated (important, browsers are a security nightmare) and your Bookwyrn instance is updated too, there should be nothing to worry about even if the app itself isn’t updated in a year or more.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

I’d love to, but let’s see how this one turns out first. It’s a lot of work and we haven’t even started writing.

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

Thanks!

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

I had a few things about the 90’s antitrust but I hadn’t seen the edited video evidence. Thanks for the link, appreciated!

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

Dev’s email is gmail. First red flag. And their social media profile are Twitter, Instagram and Facebook. Not to mention that all I can read about their “protocol” is shitty marketing speak. There’s no technical whitepaper. And there’s no code. It seems to be proprietary software which is enough reason to run away from it. Together with the rest of things, it looks like either it’s a honeypot or (more probably) a fake privacy initiative trying to grab some money/data from non technical users

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

as it’s usually the case with these shady proprietary super duper secure messengers they probably don’t have a protocol of their own. The dev probably took any other IMs source code, made a few changes to the UI and now is trying to grab some cash or data from the few people that install it.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines