schroedingershat

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

schroedingershat,

It was called horse and sparrow before that.

schroedingershat,

The modern banking apparatus would devour any fixed standard currency in a few weeks by manipulating the value. It would be like being paid ij bitcoin. Every time the plebs needed to buy more than usual, money would be worthless. Every time they were short on money and needed to sell it would be super valuable.

The only fix is redistribution. Wealth exponentially agglomerates, you have to spread it out once it does or your economic system breaks.

Biden administration unveils first 10 drugs subject to Medicare price negotiations (www.cnbc.com)

The Biden administration on Tuesday unveiled the first 10 prescription drugs that will be subject to price negotiations between manufacturers and Medicare, kicking off a controversial process that aims to make costly medications more affordable for older Americans....

schroedingershat,

Anyone who is 89 or younger was 9 when wwii ended. They did not fight in wwii. You are talking about some combination of silent generation and baby boomers.

Most if the US government is baby boomers or gen x. Only a handful are over 77

The Spotify Car Thing cost $100, but I can't use it anymore. (lemmy.ml)

EDIT: The only reason why I still had it at this point was because I could use it with other apps. However, now that my Spotify Subscription is cancelled, it doesn’t work with anything. It’s mildly infuriating because today, I can’t still use it with other apps like I was able to yesterday....

schroedingershat,

You can buy gas from anyone. Even make your own in a digester.

Your gas stove is not cryptographically locked to one gas company.

schroedingershat,

Yes, many much easier ways. A propane tank for one. Wet, high CO2 methane is really hard to make explode.

Do get a CO detector though.

schroedingershat,

Look out! Communists are coming for your toothbrush. Better vote for harsher penalties for modifying stuff you bought. The DMCA still allows throwing away or disconnecting the computer locking you out of your heated seats.

schroedingershat,

But car drivers crash into them and hurt themselves sometimes or birds perch and poop on cars. Not worth having trees /s

schroedingershat,

You can buy the panels, inverter, racking and a battery which produces more than enough for anything smaller than a mansion for <$10k. Batteries are also not really necessary and can be added later.

Why are you paying > $20k for someone to put in 60 screws and a piece of conduit?

schroedingershat,

Pv is now around $30/m^2 wholesale and $60/m^2 retail.

Not much more expensive than a sheet metal roof (far cheaper than a mature tree after all the water and tending), but a sheet metal roof doesn’t produce $100/yr worth of electricity.

Tree good. If can’t afford tree, then pv obvious choice.

schroedingershat,

Wild concept: It’s possible to offer a fair price to someone who can. You don’t need to pay $20k for one day’s labour (although you probably do need to pay about $1k for an hour for a licensed electrician to inspect and do the final hookup if you want to AC feed for winter and cloudy days). You do not need to pay $1/W or wait years for grid tie if you have a battery and size for self consumption.

Given how thoroughly ripped off you are and how dismissive you are of the price people in civilised countries consider normal, I’ll assume you’re in the US. Signature solar sell panels for 31c/W hybrid off-grid inverters for $2k and batteries for $280/kWh. You can probably do better if you look around and don’t just listen to the door to door MLM scammers.

schroedingershat,

You’re just spreading propaganda.

If you don’t personally want a thing then just shut up rather than polluting a discussion about a completely different use case.

schroedingershat,

Wouldn’t it depend on the artificial structure and how much water you are adding?

Like a piece of foam painted with pure white IR-emissive CaCO2 is going to be >10 degrees cooler than a black panel with an air gap and glass.

There are likely tradeoffs (water and cost for the tree being the main downside).

Personally I think both is good pv-magazine.com/…/sunagri-reveals-agrivoltaics-pe…

Less water, more elecricity and cooler temps than either alone.

schroedingershat,

It’s always correct to dismiss concern trolls.

schroedingershat,

Yup. Definite concern troll behavior.

Pretending the worst prices in the most expensive place in the world for solar are normal. Then pulling the hostage shield politics card in a thread about public spending. Now crying victim.

Completely standard conservative reactionary behavior.

schroedingershat,

Isn’t there a decent argument they’ve abandoned the trademark?

schroedingershat,

Elaboration on the reasons why would be nice.

schroedingershat,

Fun fact! At the current rate of about 8000 vehicles a month there will be that much battery driving around in 2038. Sales are doubling annually though.

Presumably EV sales will level off somewhere below 1 million/yr, if that happens there will be roughly this much battery imported every two years.

This is also a great place for all that “wasted” energy to go.

schroedingershat,

Canberra is running a v2g trial last I heard.

Even just putting a completely dumb 240V 2kW charger on an off peak meter (like hot water cylinders use) and only using it for load shedding would probably cover most of the storage needed. 16kWh/day is overkill for most driving profiles, then the only issue is convincing whoever owns the carpark to install/rent an outlet.

schroedingershat,

Australia’s solar market is un-price-gougey enough and electricity costs enough that I don’t think anyone would really consider not putting solar on a new build with a battery ready inverter. An investment that yields 50% return in the first year is a no brainer.

Virtual power plants seem a bit too silicon-valley, no need to demand people to submit to someone else controlling the AC when you can just ask instead. I don’t see anything wrong with a bounded variable time of use/feed-in tarriff (ie. Electricity will cost at least x, at most y, time-average z over the year, you get 30% of retail for feed-in and the prices are published day ahead). Let people own their own charger, inverter, and battery and decide for themselves what thresholds are for the controller (or opt into software).

schroedingershat,

VPPs will likely work, and likely be foisted on us (fincance ghouls need something to leech off of). I was just dreaming of a better world where instead of calling it arbitrage and extracting the surplus value via a trading market, people could just go “I’ll set my car to charge on eco” and not have their value extracted.

schroedingershat,

Net meeting is a gift to the upper middle class and wealthy to stop them nimbying and to develop the industry. If they are complaining about not getting it on new installs, it worked.

What is needed is to stop forcing them to pay $3 to the utility and a salesman for every $0.8 the actual product costs. End any fee for approval, make the sale, install and resale prices publicly available, and the utility has to pay full retail price for any energy that could have been produced by an installed system awaiting approval.

schroedingershat,

It takes a 260kg flywheel with all its mass at the edge spinning at mach 0.5 to store 1kWh.

If you want simple supply chains, build a carnot battery. It’ll be half as efficient, but far more compact (if graphite is the storage, more compact than LFP) and long lasting.

If you want a simple machine, buy a battery. The only hard part is high purity.

schroedingershat,

Just most places: re100.eng.anu.edu.au/global/

schroedingershat, (edited )

It’s not all or nothing. Running the 200MW industrial drying machine when it’s sunny doesn’t mean you can’t have a battery for your 20W CPAP.

schroedingershat,

None of this justifies running the aluminium smelter 24/7 rather than redesigning it slightly and running it 20/6. You’re straw manning.

Lowtechmagazine is a meditation on this concept and you are pretending that means anyone thinking this way wants to break into grandma’s home and switch off the ventilator in the middle of the night.

schroedingershat,

I don’t know if storage is more efficient at point of consumption or point of generation

Some time in the recent past or very near future, an incremental addition of capacity became more resource intensive than incremental new generation and battery.

So the ideal is actually have some at both, because this minimises the most wasteful part allowing transmission to run at average rather than peak generation or consumption.

It’s still better to incur mild inconvenience and eliminate storage and transmission for many applications though.

Silicon Valley elites revealed as buyers of $800m of land to build utopian city (www.theguardian.com)

After weeks of local speculation, the purchasers of 55,000 acres of northern California land have been revealed. The group Flannery Associates – backed by a cohort of Silicon Valley investors – has quietly purchased $800m worth of agricultural and empty land, the New York Times has reported. Their goal is to build a utopian...

schroedingershat,

It’s already in california.

schroedingershat,

That was end stage capitalism.

Unions mostly defeated it after that, but then everyone forgot how bad it was and elected Thatcher and Reagan

schroedingershat,

That was when and how the forgetting started.

NASA moves a step closer to supersonic passenger flights (www.cnn.com)

In July, Lockheed Martin completed the build of NASA’s X-59 test aircraft, which is designed to turn sonic booms into mere thumps, in the hope of making overland supersonic flight a possibility. Ground tests and a first test flight are planned for later in the year. NASA aims to have enough data to hand over to US regulators...

schroedingershat,

Spain and china managed just fine. Rail costs way less than 20 lane highways.

schroedingershat,

Any second now we’ll catch him doing something illegal. After the successful coup by our oathkeeper buddies, then he’ll never suspect we’re watching!

schroedingershat,

Fully privatising every space and replacing democratic government with a cabal of fuedal rentiers is not the same thing as reclaiming public space from being run at great taxpayer expense for the sole benefit of the oil industry.

They are, in fact, the opposite.

schroedingershat,

Electric motors are now capable of >90% regen, so the braking energy argument against short stops doesn’t work anymore (and the energy during motion strictly less than a rubber tired vehicle with a worse aspect ratio so long as the trip is no longer).

The amount of rail needed for short distance distribution networks could still be prohibitive in regions designed for road though. Even then one could still argue that the total infrastructure costs are lower by moving the destinations slightly given how much roads cost to maintain.

schroedingershat,

This is an incredibly dumb take.

You can put micromobility devices on a bus or train (or have one at either end). Or travel at 25km/h in a larger vehicle once a month until you get out of the micromobility path network. Or go to a car parked outside the network.

schroedingershat,

GDPR doesn’t prevent you making a recording as a private citizen of a public space on a local device in the car with a 1 week rolling buffer.

schroedingershat,

Yeah, that town 30 miles away I regularly cycle to is in a ten mile radius.

schroedingershat,

Roads always lose money, so that’s still a win. Travel speed and coverage may be a limiting factor though.

schroedingershat,

Yes. Well done. You identified the things that cost less than running a road network. Very nice good faith addition to the conversation.

schroedingershat,

This just in, millions of deaths a year and billions of tonnes of CO2 aren’t a problem. /s

schroedingershat,

Increase the fines (and scale by income) until they provide sufficient incentive to pay attention and have the tiniest bit of self control. Then the people holding a ticket can beg the engineers to fix the road to remove the need for not being lazy and impatient instead of the people whose kids were just killed.

schroedingershat, (edited )

You’re giving them far too much credit. The bad faith misapplication of arithmetic followed by demanding that other people untangle their exact “reasoning” is an intentional misinformation technique. Typically employed by fascists and nazi apologists, but not all anti-climate trolls are doing it to engineer dependence on russian uranium and gas so it is hard to tell whether they’re an astroturfer fkr rosatom, a fossil astroturfer, a uranium squeeze finance bro, someone who just really loves what’s happening to the people in places like Arlit or Adapa, or just a bad faith idiot.

People who are misinformed or ignorant deserve respect. Bad faith trolls do not.

schroedingershat,

Those rods still contain something like 90% potential energy that we’re discarding.

10%

U238 is not fissile and no closed breeding fuel cycle has ever been demonstrated to the point of running even a single full fuel load.

schroedingershat,

Thinking that a closed fuel cycle is probably possible in spite of spending 30 years and billions of dollars trying and failing isn’t the same thing as being able to do it.

schroedingershat,

Do you get paid for the bit after you break down and start hurling abuse and death threats, or just the bit where you were pretending 9/600 is 0.1?

schroedingershat,

Read the thread above, chum. Your lies was thoroughly dismantled.

schroedingershat, (edited )

The electricity generation industry measures everything in power because the main constraint is powerto meet peak load. A 1GW gas peaker that is only going to be used for 400 hours a year is 1GW. So is a 1GW coal plant that runs at 40% power 6000 hours a year. So is a 1GW solar farm that outputs peak power 1000 hours a year and 20-80% for 3000 hours.

Performatively misunderstanding this concept is just as bad, if not worse, than not including the duration figure and is usually done to try and pretend the 1GW gas peaker running at 4% capacity factor for two hours a day during summer at peak load somehow cannot be replaced by a 500MW solar farm producing at 17% and a 500MW 2hr battery with energy to spare.

If you see 2.8GW storage, and you trust it’s not just a sham project. Then you know that somewhere in the range of 2.8GW to 10GW of nameplate renewable capacity can be added to the grid. 20GWh doesn’t convey any information.

Ideally you’d mention both (and include efficiency, seasonality, input power etc.), but this particular pearl clutch is less correct than the headline and is rooted in coal and gas industry propaganda. If only one number is mentioned, then capacity is the most informative.

schroedingershat,

I’ve often wondered why more people aren’t just gaming the system.

“Yeah, the near-bankrupt coal plant I just bought is still a coal plant, ignore the wires running into it and that big dark blue surface over the coal pit is my tennis court.”

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines