jeffhykin

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

jeffhykin, (edited )

The downvotes are because of the title and the example (cause yeah; just tell her “no”). I had to read the post three times to find them, but there are good points in there. I feel bad for you.

Social health is important, and if you think something is wrong, then something is wrong. Absolutely don’t waste the prime of your life being alone Look at your city events, find clubs, get a dog and meet people at the dog park, volunteer, go to the gym, go to a skate park.

But


<span style="color:#323232;">social life ≠ social media*
</span>

The caveat* is group chats. Being excluded from a basketball pickup-games chat because of privacy has no easy answer: either compromise on privacy to improve social health, or be alone. That is something that’s not brought up in privacy communities, and I think it’s wise of you to see that problem and not be afraid to bring it up.

For the rest of the social media though, that’s absolutely not the case. It’s well documented social media always caused poor mental health, the companies know it’s bad, and they spend billions trying to cover it up.

So if you change your stance on social media, just remember: Followers and internet points are a horrible substitute for friendship.

jeffhykin,

I appreciate the tip. I’ve been getting involved with my local Cycling and Pedestrian board, and really want to get them to see things differently.

I feel like infrastructure is the real place to start for Solarpunk.

I also do a lot of FOSS. Recently I’ve been working with the open street maps API, which. has been awesome. I really want to make some automated metrics that let me say “doing XZY would be the most high impact change”.

jeffhykin,

Wait it takes forever for you? Like the piped app? Mine has been instant for the last 2 years. Like straight up faster than the Youtube offical app

jeffhykin,

Videos can* provide better privacy explanations (ex: animating asymmetric key exchange) The videos that get posted on here, well…

How about banning video essays?

jeffhykin,

I mean with how many upvotes your comment has, I think it means something is different between my experiences and other people’s. I’m just not sure what the cause of the difference is.

jeffhykin,

Does your city have ranked choice voting? If not, then there is where to focus. Maine already has it at the state level.

I’d recommend flipping the standard view of elections; federal elections are the least important, then state, and local are the most important.

After your state has ranked choice (e.g. if you’re from Maine), then I’d say it’s fair to complain about federal level choices.

jeffhykin,

I’m glad to see some exposure, but I can’t help but feel the message is misfocused; lMO Solarpunk is about which actions to take not just saying “yeah me and all my homies hate XZY”.

Its much easier to get people to agree on an action, like right to repair, see the benefit, and then draw their own ideological conclusion. Its much more welcoming and positive than than jumping straight to “my conclusion is good, you should hate XYZ with me”

jeffhykin,

I feel like its weird this post is getting so many down votes. I mean it’s not the best question, but not everyone would know that phone carriers are equally bad at privacy. Heck maybe in other countries there are some that help privacy.

jeffhykin,

I feel like somehow it being a robot arm with sensors/reactions makes it much more terrifying than an arm with predefined motions that operate in a loop

jeffhykin,

I was curious about this too and went through a few different news sources (BBC, yahoo, etc). Sadly all of them just repeated the same information.

Maybe in a few days they’ll have better details.

I've lately been making my git commit messages with AI (reddthat.com)

It writes more informative commits than I could ever make so I’m just reading what it says and mostly copy/pasting completely most of the time, I write all of the changes I’ve made into an LLM with a large context window and it write a very detailed commit not just with a title but with bullet points describing each of the...

jeffhykin,

Im shocked at all the negativity, this seems like an obvious good usecase to me, and I’m someone who finds most AI predictive stuff useless.

I never take more than 3 sec on my commit messages, most of them are “fix bug”, “update lib”, “bump”. So it’s a pretty low bar for it to make better messages than mine.

jeffhykin,

Is this an open source project?

jeffhykin,

I make really small and really frequent commits. Like I’ll commit all changes every 10 min regardless of if a feature is done or not, and basically use commits like an undo button.

I still use git history a lot (per file history usually) but even when browsing years and hundreds of commits into the past, I don’t really need detailed/thoughtful messages to find the change I’m looking for. Binary search plus those 2 or 3 word message hints are lightning fast. And the number of times I commit vastly outweighs the number of times I browse the history.

When it comes to documentation and other people, feature-branches are my “OK I fully finished this thing; here’s a summary”. I’m also not afraid to squash a ton of useless commits together right before making a PR.

TDLR; spending more than 3 sec doesn’t help future me or current me, so it’s a waste of time

jeffhykin, (edited )
  • "at least 1 out of 400 shot everyday"
  • 365 shots per 400 people per year
  • or 9.1 shots per 1 person per decade

The AVERAGE American has over 9 gunshot wounds? Man things are getting bad in the US.

Note: The other statistics seem to mostly check out (see another guy’s comment about that), which is great. It’s just weird the gun one is so astronomically inaccurate.

jeffhykin,

That’s good to see a lot of the statistics are close, and I appreciate the sources.

That said, for a full picture, I think you should mention that the average 20 year old doesn’t have 18 gunshot wounds (365 wounds per 400 per year, is about 9.1 wounds per person per decade, or 18.2 wounds per 20 years per person)

So I’d appreciate if you include a bullet point about that.

jeffhykin, (edited )

Probably had nothing to do with the tumor

BRUH, this was his suicide note:

I do not quite understand what it is that compels me to type this letter. Perhaps it is to leave some vague reason for the actions I have recently performed. I do not really understand myself these days. I am supposed to be an average reasonable and intelligent young man. However, lately (I cannot recall when it started) I have been a victim of many unusual and irrational thoughts. These thoughts constantly recur, and it requires a tremendous mental effort to concentrate on useful and progressive tasks.[43]

In his note, Whitman went on to request an autopsy be performed on his remains after he was dead to determine if there had been a biological cause for his actions.

People in the 60’s didnt just say “do an autopsy on me” unless something was severely wrong. There was little to no public understanding of neurology, the general public wouldn’t even think to guess that a brain tumor could play such a role.

And not like Whitman suspected it a little bit; before the incident he went to many doctors for help. This was his note in his journal

“I talked with a Doctor once for about two hours and tried to convey to him my fears that I felt overwhelming violent impulses. After one visit, I never saw the Doctor again, and since then have been fighting my mental turmoil alone, and seemingly to no avail.”

He talked to friends about it and nobody would take him seriously because they just saw him as a respectable person with overblown concerns. His case is part of Neurology classes in Texas universities!

jeffhykin,

While thats valid comment for the main post, for the Whitman case, he was in the military. Even with strict laws he would’ve still had easy access unless we’re talking drastic changes of having military personel not having general firearm access.

jeffhykin,

In my neurology class Whitman was the only case of the tumor clearly being a major driving factor.

I’m not saying the class was entirely comprehensive, or that the other cases were not medically-driven. The other cases we studied were psychologically driven (mental disorders) rather than physiological (e.g. tumor/cancer/head-trauma). I just wanted to say the tumor case might not be as likely as one might think.

jeffhykin, (edited )

oh sure, mental illness, but…

There is no “but” to mental illness; Mental illness is by-defintion doing things that don’t make sense, often the person performing the actions doesnt even understand why they are doing what they are doing (when extreme mental illness is involved). Motivations can be anything from visual hallucinations to “I dont know, I felt like a passenger while my body was doing things”.

Saying “ok, but like y tho” is misunderstanding how mental illness works.

jeffhykin,

What would consitute medical evidence?

jeffhykin,

It was the University of Texas at Dallas! The class was fantastic. Not only changed my understanding of how brains work, but changed it beyond what I thought was even possible.

I agree I think there is a very very gray line between physiological and psychological. There are some differences to be had, like tumors are actually just straight malicious, while disorders like psychopathy, ADHD, and autism can be argued to be different rather than strictly unhealthy (psychopaths make better soldiers, people with ADHD can be great in emergency rooms, people with autism can have all kinds of prodigy-like gifts). But many disorders like bipolar or schizophrenia are pretty much all unhealthly.

jeffhykin,

Wait wheres The Onion link? Why is this linking to a real article? 😬

jeffhykin, (edited )

I think an alterative caption would be “what car infastructure advocates would have me believe (and how I sometimes feel)”

jeffhykin, (edited )

(maybe I’ll make a separate comment about currency, but I feel I need to get on the soap box for a moment here)

This might be controversial so hear me out. I don’t we should assume capitalism is destroyed. But more importantly I think the reason is absolutely critical to the success of solarpunk.

We like to pretend “direct democracy good, other systems bad”, but almost all forms of governance; dictatorships, oligarchies, capitalism, republic democracies, communism, direct democracies, and socialism have their own applications. We use them all over the place; militaries almost always function as a mostly-dictatorship with some distributed autonomy. Courtrooms function as an ad-hoc oligarchy. Companies, Unions, Churches, and Cities have thousands of different governance models, from Gabe Newell leading Valve with one of the most flat companies ever, to Steve Jobs being effectively a dictator.

Yes, Solarpunk is a rejection. But it’s a rejection of the dystopian outcome.

We give the middle finger equally to Xi Jinping, Ben Shapiro, and Joseph Stalin and any other spokesperson who prescribes one medication for all problems while ignoring the dystopia flourishing around them! All of them were/are so infatuated by style of governance that they forgot the original mission.

That’s where we can be different. Solarpunk doesn’t have “a prescription”. All of us have extremely different views, backgrounds, ideas, and values. The only commonality is “we want a society worth living in”.

I strongly feel the Solarpunk ideology is:

  1. “prescribe” systems of governance for specific things
  2. See if symptoms improve
  3. and $&!#-ing change the prescription when it doesn’t work

We should angrily reject the current prescription (and in the US that means rejecting our pay-politicans-to-win, fake-freedom, megacorp dominated capitalism)

But.

We should not get so angry as to forget; the difference between medicine and poison is the dosage & situation.

Okay, I’ll get off my soap box now.

jeffhykin, (edited )

After reading my whole comment again and checking some more definitions I kinda see your point, so I tried to edit it a bit to be more inline with actual capitalism.

And to your credit, there actually aren’t nearly as many vibrant game worlds that actually include private ownership of the means of production, so I completely removed that section.

Wiki for scientifically backed environment/climate friendly everyday life?

Hi, I’m currently at an eco-village, and had a discussion about washing dishes per hand vs using a dishwasher. I was not completely sure, but have read somewhere, that a dishwasher is more efficient (in terms of energy and water usage). I just fact-checked that and indeed, when not being super careful by handwashing (no...

jeffhykin,

It could start by having a pinned post thats updated with links to specific-topic posts. It would be a low barrier start, and it would make sure new topics (like washing dishes) show up in a feed. (If they don’t show up in a feed I’m probably never going to read them)

Once there’s enough content it’ll be straightforward to convert to a wiki.

Topics I’d like to see are; short/simple guides to rainwater collection and solar panels

jeffhykin, (edited )

Not always (which I’ll mention in a moment) but:

  • The trivial point was; car wait times are reduced when there are less cars.
  • The main point is; even from a bike perspective its not about stopping/not-stopping, it’s about wait time. I have NEVER had so many bikes in front of me that I missed the cross-walk signal and had to wait a whole other red-light cycle. Comparatively I regularly have that happen to me in a car. Idk if its a 30% improvement but its less time waiting at red lights.
  • Finally, technically no, bikes don’t always have to (legally) wait at red lights. This is only a technicallity but some crosswalks, like several in my town (or the iconic one in Japan), we get the walk signal on red. My town is also unusual by officially allowing bikes on pedestrian paths. So bikes can legally cross on red.
jeffhykin, (edited )

So I do reinforcement learning research at my university, and the coworker I sit next to everyday does traffic signal optimization using multi agent reinforcement learning and simulation. (E.g. his reseach is on stuff like this paper)

And we literally agree with you; sensors are THE problem for 90% of the inefficiency. Its rare to even know how many cars pass through in a day, or whether its 1 or 500 cars waiting at a light. However, Google knows (or can approximate), which is partially why they and they alone can get something like 30% improvement.

The other 10% inefficiemcy is coordination stuff though, which can be more difficult than you might think to fix.

Visual Studio Code is designed to fracture (ghuntley.com)

In this blog post, we explore the ecosystem of open-source forks, revisit the story so far with how Microsoft has been transforming from products to services, go deep into why the Visual Studio Code ecosystem is designed to fracture, and the legal implications of this design then discuss future problems faced by the software...

jeffhykin, (edited )

"Its MIT open source and anyone can use it!"

  • But Microsoft only publishes a not-MIT licensed one
  • And if you DONT use that one, the extension store wont work
  • And even if you make your own extension store (which people did) you legally wont be allowed to use any of the de-facto quality of life extensions (Python, SSH, Docker, C#, C++, Live Share, etc)
  • And those extensions default to needing fully-closed-source tools develped by microsoft
  • AND anything that tries to build on top of VS Code, (e.g. gitpod; a web-based dev environment) will die because none of the de-facto/core/quality-of-life extensions people are used to will be available. They’ll have to use the Microsoft alternative (e.g. Github workspaces)

The MIT codebase is just bait

jeffhykin,

Will it ever hurt though? Its designed to make GitPod just feel uncomfortable while making VS Code feels good.

jeffhykin,

I want exclusively law-abiding citizens to be forced to live in glass houses!

jeffhykin,

Is it just me or does it feel kinda unclean for it to just support 1 through 9?

jeffhykin, (edited )

I dislike these kinds of articles (as someone who bikes to work everyday) because of how they treat an urban perspective as if its the only perspective. Some highway stoplights are in the middle of nowhere, have no crosswalk, can go a full year without a single pedestrian, and often have mimal cars. People who sit at those lights every day get mad from articles (like this one) that are completely tonedeaf to their situation.

Yes, in a busy city it makes no sense to allow turn on red, and the article has some great info but it also makes no sense to wait 2 minutes on red when there isn’t a car or human within a 5 mile radius.

If we want people to be onboard with change we’ve got to include them. We can solve both; like getting rual lights to use a flashing red to indicate “allows for turning on red” and THEN get city lights to ban turning right on solid red. Solving one problem expense of another is a quick way to create enemies.

jeffhykin,

I didnt upvote this, but why are people downvoting it??? I don’t understand.

jeffhykin, (edited )

Sure, there’s lots of solutions, but we have to talk about them. Even something as simple as “turning on red is often used as a crutch for signaling issues. We shouldnt be waiting at stop lights in the middle of nowhere when theres nobody nearby in the first place”

The key point is *include these people, their situation, their perspective, in the discussion"

jeffhykin,

Pease consider the opposite; if a fork is needed at some point in the future, we need people who are familiar with the codebase. It would be, for example, much better for 3 of 4 contributors to be sane than only 2 of 3.

jeffhykin,

I mean yeah, but I do like knowing who and in what way.

jeffhykin,

There are jobs where psychopaths and sociopaths can be productive helpful members of society. There’s a neuroscientist (James Fallon) who was studying brain scans of psychopaths, only to realize that HE was a psychopath (both his brain scan and his behavior; low empathy, motivated by power, isn’t bothered by manipulating others, etc). Jobs can be positions like green Berets, Navy Seals, surgeons (some times you need to inflict pain to get the job done). We need a strong support system around them, but that can be said of most positions (think government checks and balances or police body cams).

For the intentionally malicious (which can be an entirely separate group of people) I imagine two steps:

  1. A system of early identification. Probably starting with mental health discussions being common place, like brain scans being as common as getting the chicken pox vaccine. E.g. find the serial killer when they’re 17 years old and killing cats for fun, provide help and monitor instead of doing nothing and waiting till they’re 56 and have been a recluse for 10 years.
  2. Creating systems of least-restriction and gradually-increasing restriction; Serial killers and phedophiles can still garden, write, paint, build, etc. And its better for everyone if they contribute to society in some way instead of rotting in a cell. E.g. restrict phedophiles from ever being around children, restrict serial killers to remote work. Its a matter of ensuring they have no opportunity to do harm. This isn’t just a system for serial killers, but ideally would be a culture-encouraged movement of limiting the damage of people’s flaws; we keep the junk food out of sight when a friend who is trying to loose weight comes over. We help people identify if they have sesonal depression, and recommend places to live that have the shortest (or non-existant) winter season, have workplaces that keep emails, phone calls, and other interruptions at a minimum for those who have ADHD, etc. It just happens that those who demonstrate malicious intentions get forced accomodations instead of optional ones.
jeffhykin,

As someone who thinks psychopaths can be helpful in the right job postions, I agree the mild cases of psychopaths probably do the most harm in policical positons, even more than serial killers. And I also agree its caused by a governance problem that would ideally already be solved.

jeffhykin,

I (also) want to say; I’m glad to see this question.

Its easy to skim over difficult aspects, focus on the positive, and pretend a movement/idea is a silver-bullet. So I really enjoy when challenges are brought up to be addressed head-on.

Even if the question wasn’t sincere (e.g. “checkmate atheists” kinda vibe) I would’ve answered it the same. But it was really nice to look at your other posts and see that, yeah, it probably was a legit question

How do you feel about TypeScript?

Specifically, do you worry that Microsoft is going to eventually do the Microsoft thing and horribly fuck it up for everyone? I’ve really grown to appreciate the language itself, but I’m wary of it getting too ingrained at work only to have the rug pulled out from under us when it’s become hard to back out....

jeffhykin,

Ah thank you, that makes more sense.

jeffhykin, (edited )

I didn’t say C++ was a superset of C, I said “if I take my c code and add a cpp extension it works”. Believe me, I am painfully aware of the not-a-superset problem between C and C++. My point is Typescript doesn’t even meet the very loose “its practically a superset” relationship that C++ has with C.

jeffhykin, (edited )

That is an important difference. Still lots of people, myself included, classify “compiler printing an error (not a warning)” as failure, even if bizzarly the code still runs somehow.

jeffhykin,

Don’t worry, none of my code uses that, designated initilizers, complex numbers, variable length arrays, typedef name overloading, unintilized constants, implicit void pointer casting, implicit function declarations, nested struct defintions, or any of the other exclusively-C features.

jeffhykin,

I think you mean ages 0-255

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines