Kid_Thunder

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Kid_Thunder,

I know it's bleeding edge and asking a lot in a technical sense but how about letting us set what our homepage actually is? I know in the ~35 years browsers have existed, this has been an elusive feature but if anyone can do it, it is Mozilla.

Kid_Thunder,

Mine is Trogdor.

I should make the password consummate v's.

Kid_Thunder,

Growing up in western NC, it was always Coke when I was a kid. But then shopping carts were buggies and toilets were commodes back then too.

Kid_Thunder,

80s and 90s. I was a millennial when we were called Gen Y but like I said, west NC. I think being closer to Appalachia and thus Appalachian probably matters. So sometimes pants or jeans were 'britches', though not used by people my age then, "fixin'" was used a lot ("I'm fixen to come over yonder ('over' being optional here)" or perhaps 'reckon' in "I reckon that's about a mile down that ways" where you 'think' it might be a mile over there. 'Y'all' was outpacing 'you'uns' by then. 'Foot' instead of 'feet' specifically for measurement was still used. Like "That's about 2 foot thick." Holler could be used two ways, one of those being to 'yell' or talk to someone or to describe a small valley. A toboggan was those knitted hats (stocking caps) you'd wear rather than the sled you'd typically be riding on wearing one of these. When you're a young kid they'd sometimes have those stupid puffy balls on top of them. One of my grandmothers would use 'I swunney!' as an exclamation of being appalled or surprised by an outcome. I have no idea where that came from. 'Chaw' was used by older folks to describe a wad of chewing tobacco like "You have some chaw I can get?" A 'bald' was a the top of a mountain without trees and usually mostly rocks like "You can see 3 states from any of them balds over there." Sometimes old people would call a backpack a 'tow sack' or even 'clean' is used kind of odd like "He knocked it clean out of the park!"

We were still taught that slaves had it better off in some plantations and that many came back from the 'silent North' (implying blacks were straight up ignored and at least down South where they'd be beaten, lynched and tortured some thought that this attention was somehow better I guess) and that the Civil War was about States Rights and the issue of slavery wasn't actually important. I'm not sure if it still is but I hope not. I assume it isn't the way my family goes on and on about indoctrination of children outside of homeschooling.

Kid_Thunder,

I'm not sure how true it was but an anecdote my social studies teacher told us was that the dialect was closer to victorian/older (not quite Old English) English and that's how Britain used to speak. However, in my opinion, they probably confused that with Britain specifically changing to non-rhotic English annunciation post the Revolutionary War with the, now US, to further separate culture. I don't study linguistics so maybe she was right and I am wrong though. I've just never happened across anything of repute backing that up.

Kid_Thunder,

Personally, I use Fedora KDE Spin because it's stable, has an aggressive update schedule and if I want something from AUR or something, I'll just use its OCI in distrobox and get it anyway. I also prefer flatpaks over snaps.

Kid_Thunder,

Coming Soon xXWokMaster420Xx

Kid_Thunder, (edited )

HOAs started as a way to keep neighborhoods white only. Now it's a way for developers to have a super majority vote to keep giving themselves contracts and a way for control freaks to control their neighbors. They started as bad actors and now some are bad actors for other reasons.

Not all HOAs are terrible but there aren't a lot of actual accountability in-spite of some laws to stop corruption and there's not a ton of benefits for most except perhaps for condos.

For example, I wouldn't mind having an HOA that contracts rates for trash, lawn care, creates and maintains a park with some stuff for kids, maintains beautification of non-homeowner areas and maybe even has security patrols. You know, actual amenities to keep the neighborhood nice and convenient for the home owners. Not an HOA that makes sure that shampoo bottles in people's bathroom windows aren't visible, front doors have to match some aesthetic or have to approve decks and sheds for people's yards.

Kid_Thunder,

Yes I did and I'm embarrassed. Thank you for the correction!!

Kid_Thunder,

I rent in a medium-high-density non-US housing complex.

Well, we're talking about home ownership here. If you're renting then your landlord/management company or whatever decides policies that are compliant with your laws. If they allow some sort of HOA-like structure where residents can participate in a sort of 'council' that advises them or has some sort of authority of the landlord, then so be it.

I did however, bring up condos, where a person essentially has an ownership stake in a housing complex but other people also have ownership of their dwelling and the land is shared. It absolutely makes sense to have an HOA then. Someone's got to arbitrate in shared spaces and since the person that owns the dwelling doesn't have a landlord, then well, it would be terrible not to have an HOA.

Local governing bodies are not necessarily based in racism

I didn't say they were. I am stating a fact, that in the US, HOAs started as way to enforce gentrification. There were actual racist deed agreements and binding covenants. This isn't an opinion or speculation.

Sources:

University of Washington
Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society
Housing Matters
Denver Post
Business Insider

But experience has also told me that this works better when the overarching legal systems are more accessible and corruption-resistant.

OK but that's not everyone's opinion. My neighbors and I get along fine without an HOA, except for the lady who denied receiving my package once even though I had it on camera and my wife's curtains are hanging on her windows now but an HOA wouldn't have solved that anyway.

Kid_Thunder,

It is happening in California too because of all of the wild fires mostly.

Kid_Thunder, (edited )

I think they should be copyrightable. AI is just a tool for the artist like a paintbrush, an art program (and now some of those even have AI tools built-in) or even filters on photos. Even if using others' original works to train the AI, the result should be transformative which is already a mechanism that exists within US Copyright Fair Use.

As AI image generation methods improve, it will become difficult if not impossible to distinguish between an image being generated by AI or with the help of AI or not. Even if the stance will universally become "no" how could it actually be enforced? What sort of objective validation could happen that always gets it right?

Furthermore, how much would someone need to change the end-product to not be considered "AI created" anymore anyway? How transformative must it be?

Regardless of the answer now, it is almost certain that the answer in the future will be "yes".

Kid_Thunder,

Force majeure is the legal boundary that's being referred to. Basically the company can't force it's unionized employees to go against their union's sympathy strike. Therefore, they can't be held liable. At least that's what they are arguing.

HP says I should have known its £399 laptop bargain was too good to be true (www.theguardian.com)

[…] Parcelforce texted the delivery slot. No delivery. Parcelforce and HP’s tracking systems then claimed I had refused the parcel. I scheduled a redelivery for the next day. Parcelforce then rang me and the agent acknowledged a delivery had not been attempted and that the tracking information was false. It claimed HP had...

Kid_Thunder,

I'd stay away from their storage solutions and network gear as well. They are trash.

Kid_Thunder,

It doesn’t matter. The suit is alleging that valve threatened to ban games if they were cheaper on other stores. Thats monopolistic price manipulation, and it’s illegal.

That is only true specifically for Steam keys and is a very important distinction. You can't sell your game cheaper with your free Steam keys on another store cheaper than Steam without giving Steam customers the same discount within a 'reasonable amount of time'.

Publishers/Developers are free to undercut Steam with non-Steam keys on other stores.

From their policy:

It's OK to run a discount for Steam Keys on different stores at different times as long as you plan to give a comparable offer to Steam customers within a reasonable amount of time.

Non-root user that (suddenly) has elevated privileges in a specific command (only). [Have I been hacked?]

Title. Long,short story: creating or editing files with nano as my non-root user gives (the file) elevated privileges, like I have ran it w/ sudo or as root. And the (only) “security hole” that I can think of is a nextdns docker container running as root. That aside, its very “overkill” security-wise (cap_drop=ALL,...

Kid_Thunder,

The directory you are creating your files in likely is set to immutable or append only.

lsattr -d /path/to/directory

if you see i or a, then that's the issue.

You can remove them with
sudo chattr -i /path/to/dir immutable
sudo chattr -a /path/to/dir append only

Same goes for files but if it happens to all files in a directory, then that is probably it.

Kid_Thunder,

Gnome's Boxes is pretty easy to use and of course uses qemu + KVM. This would be a type 1 hypervisor vs. Virtualbox's type 2. It is point and click like Virtualbox. You don't need to use Gnome's DE to use Boxes.

I have seen people post about your specific error for years when using the virtualbox website's repository instead of their own distro's repository (if it exists).

Kid_Thunder,

In Boxes, power down your XP VM, click Settings -> Sharing Panel -> Enable Sharing toggle. Click File Sharing and enable File Sharing. Power on the VM.

At that point you should be able to drag and drop from your host direct into your VM for a file transfer.

You can also click the vertical dots menu in the Guest's console "screen" and click Send File... menu option.

In the same menu you can click Devices & Shares -> Realtek USB or whatever -> Local Folder -> Select from the dropdown for the Host's folder that you'd like to share -> Save -> Make sure Toggle on the right is on.

Then your folder, I believe in XP, will show up as a removable drive like a USB drive would.

Kid_Thunder,

If there's an adblock I can't get around because, for example, I'm using a DNS server that blocks ads on my phone then I just create a snapshot in the Wayback Machine. For whatever reason, websites don't block them or they're just really good at circumventing them.

http://web.archive.org/web/20231107062355/https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-11-06/ty-article/german-journalists-detained-by-israeli-soldiers-asked-if-we-were-jewish-at-gunpoint/0000018b-a5ae-d9c0-a5fb-edfee9ed0000

Kid_Thunder,

Is there a perceptible profit motive? No? Then we're wasting resources that could be used to chase things that have shareholder value.

  • Corporate "Ethics"
Kid_Thunder,

PG&E be like:

that's 🔥

Kid_Thunder,

No, she said they were intercepting forearms. She would no after all. There the best intel analyst the Chesire Police had to offer I'm sure.

I no [sic] a lady who works for the police. This is not hearsay. Direct to me. They can access Encro software. And are using to intercept forearms [sic] only at the moment. There [sic] software runs 48 hours behind real time. So have ur burns one day max. And try to avoid giving postcodes over it.

Don't people read the article anymore?

Kid_Thunder,

They should have their slogan be "Our cleaner fees are cheaper than Airbnb!"

Kid_Thunder,

And they said the Hamas and Israelis can't find common ground on anything.

Kid_Thunder,

SEO ruined the Internet because it made SEO essential to be seen in relevant search results above other less relevant search results. In other words, less relevant search results can often be seen on the first page along with more relevant search results, or even sometimes instead of relevant search results on the first 2 pages of any reputable search engine.

Also, Internet Reputation companies have proven that SEO and fake content can be used as a weapon to push relevant search results so far down nobody sees them anymore.

Finally, how many times have you searched for something just to come across some random webpage with just a bunch of word salad that happens to somehow be relevant. An easy example of this are phone numbers. You search for a phone number that called you and chances are you won't see much relevant data. Just a mix of "robocaller" reporting websites -- usually with no information and random websites with just a bunch of phone numbers in sequential order with no relevant data whatsoever. Even if it's a business' actual phone number.

Kid_Thunder,

I don't know how it is now but back in the late 00's/very early 10's I had attempted to correct some obvious mistakes in some articles I came across. Some edits were immediately reverted -- seemingly by a bot while others were reverted to some editor. On some, I tried using Talk to discuss why the reversion is incorrect and had put forth better sources (the actual source) instead of some 'scientific journalist's' article that got it wrong and was basically threatened that I'd be banned.

These weren't some esoteric or difficult subjects but fairly well-known and straight-forward data. It was such a hassle that I just gave up after my very short foray into Wikipedia editing for 5 or so years. I gave it another go for some subjects in my industry and learned that editors are not only territorial but take corrections personally. Sources be damned. What I've seen is so-called scientific journalists for news articles/blogs are just anecdotes pulled from paper abstracts. An abstract of an abstract with opinions not derived from the actual data. How is something like theregister, CNN, MSNBC or Fox News more reputable than the sources that they sourced from?

With that, the well-known advice of "Take Wikipedia with a grain of salt and actually read the cited sources." and more importantly, the cited sources' source, rings true.

In other words, in my opinion, Wikipedia is more a summary of blogspam than it is an encyclopedia, though there are some exceptions of course.

Kid_Thunder,

Well, this was back in the late 00s/early 10s. So circa 2008 - 2010. I don't remember the exact year.

I'd assume they had to make a policy against territorial editors because it was already a problem though. I definitely experienced it.

Kid_Thunder,

Is there also a policy against evading blocks/bans? If there was then perhaps the subject in this article would have never happened.

Perhaps the takeaway here is that we could all learn from writing policies that would definitely solve every instance of a problem. For example, if a company could have policies against sexual harassment it could all stop.

In another example on a bigger scale, if countries would sign a treatise of some type with other peoples and nations then we could all get along far better. A great example of this could be when the US signed various treaties with different Native American Tribes such, as happens, this Wikipedia article describes.

Thank you. I believe the world could learn much from our discussion and I know, I feel that my own experiences and opinions have been rightfully invalidated.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines
    •