doctorcrimson,

Why don’t people want to die for oil, these days?! /sarcasm

reverendsteveii,

Welp, looks like it’s back to lying to vulnerable children

Nioxic,

35000 AND a job?

So a signing bonus?

IHaveTwoCows,

The jig is up, US Military…we know what you are now

GrindingGears,

Am I the only dad (other than OP) traumatized enough to get the “Got any Grapes” reference?

imPastaSyndrome,

only dad

Broski the song was a popular flash animation on albino-blacksheep like 20+ years ago, so nah.

SMT42,

The kids who grew up with it are dads now

Arcania85,

Wadddle waddle and he waddeld awaaayyy

ChillPill,
@ChillPill@lemmy.world avatar

I blame Wade.

Zealousideal_Fox900,

I blame Roe

TheOakTree,

So a bird saunters up to a citrus refreshment booth, and he communicates to the booth attendant, saying “hello (bom bom bom) do you happen to possess any grapes?”

The attendant returned “no, we only deal in the business of citrus refreshments, although the drinks are cool and crisp, and they were prepared in my household! Could I interest you in a serving?”

The bird returns, “I’ve no need.”

Ducktape,

Recruiters chase misery like sharks chase blood. That costume is probably more comfortable than the shit the army makes you wear and he can tell his boss to fuck off if he gets sick of it.

Delusional,

And he gets paid more to wear that costume than the military one.

drphungky,

Recruiters chase misery like sharks chase blood.

I mean, accurate but Jesus Christ that’s brutal haha.

WaxedWookie,

The scars on my mate’s back from lugging their frequently hazardous nonsense around would support this.

Duck costumes also don’t render you unable to have sons as every kid he and his former unit members have seems to prove.

SaintFlow,

Quack off

TheDoozer,

Coast Guard is offering $65k for anyone who wants to cook.

It’s honestly a pretty miserable job, but you’re not getting shot at, sooooo…

frezik,

If I had to join a service (and I’m just plain too old at this point, anyway), it’d probably be the Coast Guard. Their primary mission is saving lives. One issue is that they’re also an arm in the War on Drugs, and that’s where shooting might actually come into play. Other issue is how they handle refugees. That said, you can still feel better about their work than the regular military.

roboticide,

Many, if not most “regular military” jobs in Western armed forces don’t involve front line combat and getting shot at or shooting at people. Less than 10%.

Now obviously, you look at Ukraine and think “Well that’s a lot bigger than 10%,” and it probably is. But any country with a large air force, navy, and sizeable ground forces are gonna have thousands of people trained to load weapons onto planes, manage ship engines, cook, drive supply trucks, load cargo planes, cook, manage payroll, manage procurement of equipment, fly drones, cook, run propaganda and recruitment, operate medical facilities… the list goes on.

I had an ex whose brother was going to med school to be a surgeon for the Navy. Her father, who was an Army pilot, thought it was great because he knew his son was just gonna be (relatively) safe on a carrier or hospital ship somewhere, not getting shot at, and just saving lives.

Nioxic,

Yep.

I heard about a surgeon he worked at a military base. Sure he would see gun wounds etc

But never actually be in combat himself

eestileib,

I used to game with a former Coastie, he said roughly the same thing.

Same GI Bill, same pension system, and you get to actually do shit most of the time you’re in.

TheDoozer,

Yeah, I joined for the GI Bill (and steady work, as I was 26 and working at a cable television call center), and ended up staying in because the job I was doing was preferable to what I had wanted to get a degree to do. I went into aviation, though (helicopter flight mechanic and avionics electrical technician). It’s been an awesome job and I get to retire in 6 years and get a paycheck for the rest of my life! And my kids get my GI Bill, so between the two of them they have 4 years of college paid (while also getting an allowance for housing).

I’ve never had to shoot at anybody or get shot at and have been in operational jobs my whole career. I’ve never been put in a situation where I had to do something morally questionable.

That said, if I went for a non-aviation rate I’d probably have done 4 and out, and get my degree. The other rates seem either boring or miserable (to me). Then again, the vast majority of civilians jobs feel the same way to me, so YMMV.

TheDoozer,

(and I’m just plain too old at this point, anyway)

Not sure how old you are, but the max age for active duty enlistment was raised to 42. Which, as a person who went through boot camp at 26/27 and just turned 40, is nuts.

afraid_of_zombies,

I worked for a coast guard contractor many many years ago. It also wasnt a great job but was kinda nice knowing that I might help save lives someday.

Mango,

Service industry for an especially entitled clientele? Fuck off. That’s not nearly enough money.

beefcat,
@beefcat@lemmy.world avatar

only 35k to dodge bullets in some far off corner of the world away from your loved ones?

and they’re surprised no one is taking that offer?

MataVatnik,

Kinda sounds like a good time ngl

sebinspace,

Weird kink but you do you

MataVatnik,

When I beat my meat I fantasize about being a red coat oppressing colonial Americans in the 1770s

MooseBoys,

That’s $35K, plus free room and board. If you have no loved ones, it’s actually a pretty decent option.

Draedron,

You also need a lack of conscience to invade other countries and kill their citizens and bomb their hospitals though

doctorcrimson,

It wasn’t all that bad, most of the really horrible crimes were committed by the CIA. Army Grunts were there to clean up afterwards. I think a lot of the infrastructure developments and border security policies in the Middle East actually truly helped alleviate the radical wahhabi islamic militant groups that were created when the USA toppled democracy in the region during and after WWII.

hOrni,

Did You miss the “bullets” part?

spookedbyroaches,

Do you think that all army jobs are bullets and action? It’s most likely gonna be administrative stuff. Especially since the Afghan war is over.

Hboc22,

As a vet, believe me you welcome the fucking bullets. I would rather be deployed than be in garrison. You have no idea how insufferable the bureaucratic bullshit in the military is. Im not downplaying the war part, but your mileage will vary with exposure to life threatening situations depending on where you get placed. You may land in an assignment that places you directly in harms way on a constant basis, you might never end up in a combat situation at all, or anything in-between. It’s all luck of the draw, you don’t pick your duty station. However the one constant thing you will find wherever you go is the most asinine frustrating circuitous bullshit that you have to deal with on a daily basis. The hoops you need to jump through for the most basic shit. The dumb old fucks that outrank you getting anal retentive about regulations that they’ve clearly never read. The ridiculous amount of busy work. So much bullshit. There were plenty of times when I was in that I WISHED someone would fucking shoot me.

IHaveTwoCows,

This is exactly why I do not believe the US military to be as mighty as it claims: there is no autonomy, and- as the Millenial Challenge games showed- it relies too much on technology and order.

ricecake,

… You think the US military is weak because it relies on technology, and how it fared in a simulated war against itself?

Are you forgetting stuff like how we’ve actually seen it go to war? Or how we’ve all become so used to how it fights that when Russia invaded Ukraine, we were all startled that it didn’t unfold like the typical US invasions do?

IHaveTwoCows,

It took twenty years to give up on trying to beat camel jockeys. At least the rice farmers that whipped their asses had trees to hide behind.

MooseBoys,

The US military has 1.4M active-duty personnel. With a turnover rate around 20% per 36 months, that’s about 2.9M cumulative service members from 2001-2021. During that same time period, US forces suffered about 7000 casualties. That’s a fatality rate of 0.24%, which is not that much higher than that of a civilian living in Detroit in the 90s.

TheAlbatross,

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • RaoulDook,

    But would you have to live in New Jersey?

    EncryptKeeper,

    Dealbreaker

    pythonoob,

    The 35k I’m assuming is a sign on bonus

    beefcat,
    @beefcat@lemmy.world avatar

    it’s not, that is your annual salary

    skydivekingair,

    It’s probably the signing bonus, base pay for an E-1 is much lower. Going off 2023 rates the first year base pay comes out to $22,432.80 plus BAH/S, specialty pay etc. might bring it up to $30k ish. Even if they are coming in as an E-4 base pay will be $30,042.

    pythonoob,

    Based on what information do you assert this as fact?

    beefcat, (edited )
    @beefcat@lemmy.world avatar

    it’s barely more than what they offered me when i was in high school and i told them to fuck off? military service does not pay all that well

    pythonoob,

    There are absolutely jobs that have a 35k sign on bonus. Or did at least. The way the OP is worded would be strange for it to be base pay. Sounds like a bonus to me. But you can think what you want.

    roboticide,

    Not to shill for the US military, but, uh… source on NJ paying anything comparable?

    I don’t know if you’ve looked for a job in the US lately, but the prospects for a 19 year old with just a diploma, and not pursuing a college degree or a skilled trade, are pretty dismal.

    You’re looking at something ~$30k for a Starbucks barista or a McDonald’s burger flipper, or maybe ~$36k if there’s an automotive plant nearby. Both are hourly, so gotta hope they actually give you decent hours if you go the fast food route. If you go the autoworker route, hope you enjoy 8+ hours of repetitive, non-stop, physical labor. You’re then spending at least a third of your ~$20k - $25k take home on rent and another third on food.

    Compare that to $36k, with no significant costs for room and board. You’re paying federal taxes but the deductions for active military are huge and most states waive income tax for soldiers. Your take home is better, your expenses are less, your fit, healthy, and your healthcare is covered for life, and if you leave after your contract is up you get to enjoy the government paying for college.

    Like 99% percent of military personnel never see combat, and especially now that we’re done with Afghanistan and Iraq it’s even safer.

    The military’s problem is that anyone smart enough to do that math and weigh those choices is probably smart enough to do something else, but for millions of people it’s a better choice than slaving away at McDick’s as cost of living and college tuition continues to rise.

    bleistift2,

    healthcare is covered for life

    As a foreigner I wonder why we see so many veterans with untreated psychiatric problems in movies or on the news.

    roboticide,

    Few reasons:

    1. The system is far from perfect. It’s not as good as say, the NHS or Canada’s health system. And while it’s “free” healthcare that is better than the non-existent free healthcare that doesn’t exist for other Americans, it’s underfunded and understaffed, especially following 20 years of war which obviously saw a huge strain put on the VA system.
    2. It’s only healthcare. Veterans with untreated psychiatric problems also often struggle with homelessness and stable employment. If they’re transient, it can be difficult to insure they, say, make a key appointment to get a diagnosis or prescription.
    3. Many people who are largely on their own with psychological issues, including but not limited to veterans, simply do not stick with a treatment regimen. There aren’t a lot of mechanisms in place to force someone to take a prescribed drug, even if it helps, and don’t like how it makes them feel. This obviously can feed back into #2.
    4. Selection bias. It seems like “so many” because our military is huge. 1.9 million US troops were deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan over the past 20 years. Of those let’s say 5% saw actual combat (hard to say how many, but all estimates I have seen say certainly not more than 10%), which is 95,000. If most of those end up with PTSD, that’s more soldiers than most of the coalition forces sent over, combined. If around half do (and around 35,000 US troops were injured, so this tracks), that’s more than France’s entire contribution to the invasion and occupation. The vast majority of the remaining 1.8 million who went over and weren’t in combat are typically fine. Sure, some will also have psychological issues, but these are people who might have anyway even if they weren’t in the military.
    doctorcrimson,

    It’s not really a rate it’s a bonus. It doesn’t say annually, it says 35k… and… a job.

    ChemicalSlippers,

    Depends on how much you value your life and independence.

    Mango,

    Life? Not at all. Independence? What’s that?

    guckfoogle,

    Lol not even close, it’s 35k for someone just entering the service. If you get deployed to a conflict zone you’re coming back home with 60-80k, but there’s no conflicts right now so without hazard pay you’d still come back with over 50k cash for traveling through Okinawa or fucking Germany with your housing and food payed for. So for the right personality a career in the military is extremely lucrative, but it’s not for everybody.

    CSharp,

    How long to come back with that much?

    guckfoogle,

    Typical deployments are 6-9 months. 50-90k within that time frame is life changing money.

    ricecake,

    I think that’s a signing bonus. As in “we’ll give you $35k to take this job that also pays a salary”.

    I tried to look up equivalent total compensation for a new recruit would be, but it looks like it’s nontrivial to figure out. It’s something like $25k/year, and full dental, medical, housing, food, and retirement and it’s all tax exempt.

    Not a bad deal for almost no prerequisites to joining, other than the “selling your freedom” and “directly contributing to violence” parts.

    ryannathans,

    How hot is that in the rest of the world?

    Agent641,

    306 kelvin

    RGB3x3,

    555.67 Rankine

    Agent641,

    Its the same amount of hot in the rest of the world, just measured in different ways.

    monsterpiece42, (edited )

    Man, come on. The ONLY time imperial makes some decent sense is temperature: for humans, 0 is really cold and 100 is really hot.

    Edit: for anyone metric having a cow here, I am pro-metric. All I’m trying to say is that of all the hairbrained measurements in imperial, temperature is the least hairbrained.

    HankMardukas,

    100 is unacceptably hot. Nobody can live in that for long.

    86f peak temperature with 35% humidity? Tolerable. Especially when the sun goes down and the temp drops but the humidity stays lower than like 55%.

    But the next day of 95f peak temp followed by 76f nadir with 70% humidity overnight? People without A/C die. The homeless die.

    ScottyB,
    @ScottyB@lemmy.one avatar

    Small world views. Places have hotter temps than that and more rural communities and do fine.

    Not doubting your comment, but it is just localised to wherever you sourced that.

    Balthazar,
    @Balthazar@sopuli.xyz avatar

    Temperature isn’t everything. Humidity (as awful as a measurement it is) matters significantly more.

    snugglesthefalse,

    At least humidity makes sense. 0% is dry, 100% is " the air is full"

    jasory,

    What? Tropical regions regularly get that hot, are we supposed to believe that humans die off during the day and get replaced in the night?

    I live in Maricopa county, and while yes people do die from the heat, it’s not really a substantial amount (about 400 out of over 4 million). It’s almost always the elderly or people with severe health problems.

    agarorn,

    The guy is way off with humidity levels. But look up wet-bulb temperature. Over 35C on the wet bulb scale which you egt with 40C and 70% humidity will kill you.

    www.omnicalculator.com/physics/wet-bulb

    jasory,

    You should have linked a physiology reference.

    Do you know what temperature a hot tub is? That’s with nearly full body immersion, 40 C with 70 percent humidity is easily survivable.

    Of course any outside temperature above 37 has a possibility of killing you, but those are the extreme outliers. If the claims being made here were accurate, humans wouldn’t exist, we would never have survived a tropical summer.

    agarorn,

    Of course you don’t die instantly. The guy above talked about temperatures like that over a longer period, i. E. A whole day.

    People can survive 100C+ saunas for 15+ minutes. But 40C and 100% humidity will kill you after a couple hours.

    jasory,

    Again, no. As long as you can replenish water and electrolytes, you’re not going to die. It doesn’t take a few hours to kill someone by heat. If you are actually unable to regulate your body temperature, your core temperature will increase much faster than “taking a whole day”. It’s the loss of water and electrolytes that inihibits your metabolism and cooling that makes you die, not the heat taking several hours to permeate through your skin. (Human metabolism generates a lot of heat, so this idea is even more absurd if you think about it).

    Read a physiology textbook, or even basic evolutionary biology if a human couldn’t survive 40C with humidity, humans would be extinct.

    agarorn,

    It seems like you talk about sweating - thats why you talk about the replenish water and ectrolytes part. I hope you know how sweating works and that it only works if the humidity is not too high.

    So what do you think happens if the air temperature is over your body temperature and sweating dies not cool you down?

    Maybe you should read a book. I am really curious about a biology text book that will tell me that 40C and 100% humidity is totally fine for humans for survive, lol.

    Please start here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet-bulb_temperature?wprov=…

    jasory,

    Literally so ignorant. Sweating is not the only way to lose heat. How much heat does the body generate?

    The fact that people may die from a certain temperature, does not mean they will die which is what every person here is claiming. Again read a physiology textbook, humans aren’t that fragile.

    agarorn,

    Pls tell me something new and not continue rambling on.

    lud,

    Ah, yes. Subjectivity.

    Pretty much no one uses F°

    jcit878,

    as opposed to the measurable freezing and boiling temperature of water?

    afraid_of_zombies,

    At sealevel.

    Gabu,

    Since everyone lives near sea level, that can be safely omitted.

    afraid_of_zombies,

    Yes all 8 billion people on earth live at exactly sealevel at all times.

    Gabu,

    They do, approximately. Did you miss the basic science class in which it’s made obvious that the crust of the Earth is thin as fuck?

    afraid_of_zombies,

    You have never cooked a meal in Denver Colorado ;)

    Gabu,

    More than a third of the entire world’s population lives within 100 meters of sea level. The average person lives at less than 500 meter of sea level.

    afraid_of_zombies,

    How far above sealevel are you going to move those goalposts?

    Gabu,

    You do understand that even at 1km above sea level, boiling temperature barely changes, right?

    afraid_of_zombies,

    Is that the elevation you hauled the goalposts up to?

    SendMePhotos,

    Is cooking that different in Denver?

    afraid_of_zombies,

    Baking is impacted more than anything and anything you want to boil you have to add time to.

    darcy,
    @darcy@sh.itjust.works avatar

    your right. there is no true ‘objective’ scale for temperature. freezing/boiling water is arbitrary and not even that consistent. for 99% of use, farenheit is better for people. the biggest advantage that celsius has, is that it is the same scale as kelvin, but thats just because it was more popular in science. the rest of metric is good tho

    Mo5560, (edited )

    Here’s how you convert between the two:

    T[°C] = (T[°F] - 32)* 5/9

    32°F is 0°C which is why you need the 32 in there. For the fraction I always just try to think about whether Celsius or Fahrenheit is bigger. Accordingly, I’ll need a number smaller or larger than one.

    edit:

    Aight I got the fraction wrong, which kinda proves that it’s useless to remember lmao.

    Pipoca,

    The easy way to remember the multiplier is that there’s exactly 180 degrees between boiling and freezing in Fahrenheit, and 100 in Celsius. Just use 1.8 instead of a fraction.

    Lemminary,

    And the -32, hmm? Checkmate, atheists

    imPastaSyndrome,

    32 degrees F is freezing, as is 0 C.

    Ramen.

    Pipoca,

    In Fahrenheit, 0 is the temperature of ice in some random brine, just as 0 in Celsius is the temp of ice water.

    Fahrenheit and Celsius are defined nearly identically. Fahrenheit just chose some weird values for its basic constants, like using a weird ice brine instead of just ice water.

    Mo5560,

    I find it easier to do mental arithmetic with the fraction (and I didn’t know the boiling point of water in Fahrenheit). But thanks anyways!

    Lemminary,

    That edit lol I used to know this by heart at some point in my life. Now I’m fine knowing that it exists and use software to do it for me instead

    uis,
    @uis@lemmy.world avatar

    “Tanks’ place is in museums,

    Let them quietly rot there.”

    Also fuck Putin.

    Dark_Blade,
    @Dark_Blade@lemmy.world avatar

    Man, I’m shocked that most people would rather wear a duck costume in sweltering heat than risk taking a bullet or a grenade!

    Agent641,

    Of course people dont want to go to the trenches with a rifle and helmet, they would get mud all over their duck costume

    prettydarknwild,
    @prettydarknwild@lemmy.world avatar

    any money quantity isn’t enough when we are talking about the possibility of being killed or maimed somewhere around the globe

    seitanic,
    @seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

    Hey, now. That isn’t completely accurate. You can also get PTSD!

    prettydarknwild,
    @prettydarknwild@lemmy.world avatar

    you can also get captured and spend several years as a pow

    Honytawk,

    I’m more into it because of the killing of innocent civilian children TBH /s

    atrielienz,

    Base pay for an E1 is $23,011.2 per year. Granted you don’t have to pay for food or shelter as an E1. But. Well. Let’s not pretend it’s actually $35k a year.

    Carlo,

    I have no idea what kind of recruiting incentives are available now, but when I enlisted in 2001, a 35k enlistment bonus was not unheard of.

    AngryCommieKender,

    Seriously. I joined as a Nuke in 2000. $72,000 enlistment bonus. One year later the bonus shot up to over $200,000 once 9/11 happened.

    greywolf0x1,

    I imagine the money was the reason most of you were eager to murder as many brown ppl as you possibly could. It also possibly explains why most sane individuals who should have opposed the war supported it, once the dollar is involved common sense is gone.

    Dadifer,

    You’re being downvoted, but why else do people sign up to kill other people and be shot at voluntarily?

    loudWaterEnjoyer,
    @loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

    Not everyone can take the truth

    chiliedogg,

    Because of you want a job that’s not flipping burgers or a trade, you either need to have money for college or need to join the military to pay for college later.

    The reality is, most jobs that require a degree shouldn’t. I have a degree and have a great job, but what I do isn’t at all related to what I studied in college.

    Dadifer,

    What if we - and bear with me here - built a society where you didn’t have to kill people to go to college?

    chiliedogg,

    Sounds great.

    But until then don’t blame 18yo kids with no other prospects for taking the path that will keep them from being homeless.

    snippyfulcrum,
    @snippyfulcrum@lemmy.world avatar

    Not 100% true.

    I never finished college and have a pretty nice IT job now.

    Admittedly I had a lot of shit jobs before by some luck one of those places I worked at for a couple years had an IT opening. I applied and had somewhat of a reputation for helping out the less technically savvy peeps on my line, went to the interview, answered their questions and got my foot in the door for experience.

    It wasn’t a great paying position but eventually I was able to move elsewhere and a couple jobs later I found myself making decent money, better money than some I know that do have college degrees.

    stevedidWHAT,
    @stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world avatar

    Idk maybe try talking with someone about it without being an asshole and maybe you’d see the other side and it wouldn’t spiral into an unruly argument

    Dadifer,

    What’s the other side?

    stevedidWHAT,
    @stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world avatar

    People who have served mainly and in person if you can.

    Pretty hard to verify identities of people on message boards and forums so you could be talking to 1 guy with 20 accounts and 1 direction they want to take things.

    We’re vulnerable people to mass opinion, and on the internet mass is easily manipulated.

    skulkingaround,

    The majority of service members are not infantry. You’re far more likely to be a desk jockey or a support role than see combat.

    Dadifer,

    I struggle to see the difference.

    atrielienz,

    Because they’re poor and joining gives them a way to feed and shelter themselves and their family.

    Dadifer,

    Imagine living in a world where you have to kill other people before society thinks you’re valuable enough to feed and shelter your family.

    atrielienz, (edited )

    I mean. There are a lot of places like that including ones where it’s mandatory. So, what was your point again?

    Not to mention the fact that not everyone who serves actually kills people, but I imagine that distinction is lost on you.

    seitanic,
    @seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

    I’m gonna chalk that up to propaganda. Most of the people supporting the war weren’t being paid by the military.

    Agent641,

    Nukes dont doo much murdering, they mostly just sit next to the spicy thermos and wait for their shift to end.

    wanderingmagus,

    I joined the SSBN fleet to have my finger on the toggle switch when the order comes to launch thermonuclear missiles. I spend my days when on patrol in a tin can at the bottom of the sea, not shooting anyone. But if we’re gonna end human life, I want to be there to watch the world burn and make way for some species less destructive.

    afraid_of_zombies,

    I kinda want to be your best friend now.

    SARGEx117,
    1. My nuke bonus offer was 10k with “up to 100k upon reenlistment at the end of an initial 8 year enlistment” I ended up with AECF anyway.
    atrielienz, (edited )

    An enlistment bonus generally isn’t included in your yearly income for the purposes of recruitment until they know for sure what rate/mos you’ll be. Until then it’s not something a recruiter can offer unless that enlistment bonus is available to all enlistees. And it’d still only be for the single year. They aren’t giving you $75K every year of your 4-6 year first enlistment.

    JokeDeity,

    I can only hope he’s contemplating the end of it. Fuck the military and every war pig.

    PM_ME_FEET_PICS,

    AMAB

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • [email protected]
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • oklahoma
  • Socialism
  • KbinCafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • KamenRider
  • All magazines